Page 2

 
 
By Jason Brooks  |  Posted 2003-04-14 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Its clear what people want. They want to download single MP3s and, once theyve downloaded them, they want to be free to do with them whatever they want. Whats less clear is whether recording companies can make money this way. I believe that they can. The evils of unauthorized copying, the sort thatd undoubtedly increase if consumers could buy no-strings-attached digital singles direct from record companies, have been greatly exaggerated.
Downloaded music serves in a very real way as advertisement for recording artists. One of the most interesting facts pointed out in a paper on file sharing by National Association of Recording Arts and Sciences board member John Snyder is that the album "The Eminem Show," which is believed to be the most downloaded album of all time, was also the best-selling album of 2002.
No matter what the RIAA would have you believe, unauthorized downloading of music has always been a major hassle, and thats the case now more than ever. Recording companies have been very successful at polluting P2P networks with misnamed or incomplete tracks, and even when you can find good tracks over the Internet, their quality cant be compared to what you get from a CD or DVD. Whats more, its going to be a long time—maybe never—before the Internet can beat something like a post office-delivered DVD for speed in transferring data. Honestly, the recording industry has much more to worry about from CD counterfeiting than it does from unauthorized downloading. Im holding out hope, then, that Apple realizes all of this, pulls the trigger on the Universal Music purchase, and brings music distribution into the Internet age by injecting some much-needed liberalism into the mix.
And, as an added bonus, we could expect from Apple a parallel level of liberalism regarding computer platform choice as well. By necessity, Apple would have to support at least Mac and Windows, and support for other platforms, such as Linux, could then follow. Of course, theres no guarantee that any of this will happen—the sale might not go through, and Apple might start thinking different about rip, mix and burn once its owns the music. However, if Apple does take this shot, and if it sets prices to reflect its reduced distribution costs, people will pay for it. If the largest player is doing it, and its working, the rest of the business will fall in line—to everyones benefit. Apple Music: "Let It Be," or "Get Back"? Drop me a line at jason_brooks@ziffdavis.com.


 
 
 
 
As Editor in Chief of eWEEK Labs, Jason Brooks manages the Labs team and is responsible for eWEEK's print edition. Brooks joined eWEEK in 1999, and has covered wireless networking, office productivity suites, mobile devices, Windows, virtualization, and desktops and notebooks. JasonÔÇÖs coverage is currently focused on Linux and Unix operating systems, open-source software and licensing, cloud computing and Software as a Service. Follow Jason on Twitter at jasonbrooks, or reach him by email at jbrooks@eweek.com.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel