As the profession of computer programming continues to evolve, so does the jargon that typifies the daily life of a coder.
As the profession of computer programming continues to evolve, so does the jargon that typifies the daily life of a coder.
Programming is alternately referred to as coding, hacking,
developing and software engineering, among other things. And the age
old debate over whether software development should be considered a
creative endeavor or simply a rote, technical one. Whatever the case,
it's clear that among the legions of folks who are professional
programmers are some of the most intelligent and creative people in our
society. That creativity is not lost on nifty mobile apps or
money-making enterprise apps or complex technical computing apps, or
even on catchy code names whose significance to the program might be
three layers deep. Often the creativity of the modern programmer lies
in the jargon of the day. Programming has lent several terms to the
lexicon of popular speak, including spaghetti code, Easter eggs, bugs,
wizards, widgets and a lot more.
However, today in 2010, a whole new crop of programmer slang has emerged. Thanks to the folks at Stack Overflow, who prompted developers to share their programming terminology, and Joey Devilla at the Global Nerdly
blog (who was good enough to package it and help popularize it), we
have a slew of new terms, such as "Unicorny," which is used as an
adjective to describe a feature that is so early in the planning stages
that it might as well be imaginary. Or Bugfoot, which refers to a bug
that is not reproducible and has been sighted by only one person. This
is similar to the Loch Ness Monster Bug.
Meanwhile, the concept of a bug report has spawned several new
terms. There is the Drug Report, used to describe a bug report so
utterly incomprehensible that whoever submitted it must have been
smoking crack. The lesser version is a Chug Report, where the submitter
is thought have had one too many. And then there is the Smug Report,
which describes a bug submitted by a user who thinks he knows a lot
more about the system's design than he really does. Filled with
irrelevant technical details and one or more suggestions (always wrong)
about what he thinks is causing the problem and how we should fix it.
Finally, there's the Shrug Report, which is a bug report with no error
message or repro steps and only a vague description of the problem.
Usually contains the phrase "doesn't work."
Other interesting programming terms originate in relationships. For
instance, there is the Common Law Feature: A bug in the application
that has existed so long that it is now part of the expected
functionality, and user support is required to actually fix it. And
there also is the Mad Girlfriend Bug, which occurs when a developer
sees something strange happening, but when he inquires about it it will
just say that everything is fine.
Another term that is indicative of the way many programmers work is
Code Slush, as opposed to Code Freeze, Code Slush is a term for the
date after which no changes will be accepted, except, of course, all
the changes that management will ask for at the last minute. It is like
Code Freeze, but accepting of the fact that some changes will still get
in.
Meanwhile, I'm sure my friend Rod Johnson and the folks over at the
SpringSource division of VMware would like this one: Lethal Dependency
Injection, when a programmer uses too much Spring XML wiring to
configure a handful of classes.
Mostly, you don't want to be considered an Impediphile - Someone who
codes in such a manner as to constantly cause impediments to others
work.
Are you a nerd? What are some of the unique programming terms in your shop?
Darryl K. Taft covers the development tools and developer-related issues beat from his office in Baltimore. He has more than 10 years of experience in the business and is always looking for the next scoop. Taft is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and was named 'one of the most active middleware reporters in the world' by The Middleware Co. He also has his own card in the 'Who's Who in Enterprise Java' deck.