Mozilla Firefox received the early edge over the Google Chrome Web browser
in a head-to-head match-up of software tools that let users elude ad-tracking
cookies, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Mozilla Jan. 23 introduced its Do Not Track HTTP header that will allow users
to opt out of online behavioral tracking by advertisers with every click or
page view in Firefox, which is used by roughly one quarter of the world's Web
users.
The tool is not yet available, but when it is and users choose to enable it in
their Firefox installation, Websites will be told by Firefox that a user would
like to opt out of online behavioral tracking.
Google followed Mozilla Jan. 24 with Keep My Opt Outs, a Chrome
browser extension that lets users permanently opt out of being tracked online
by advertisers' cookies.
However, it only enables opt-out from some 50 ad networks in the Network
Advertising Initiative that already let people decline targeted ads with a
cookie-based tool. These include Google, Yahoo, Microsoft and others.
Both Mozilla's and Google's moves, quasi-celebrations ahead of Data Privacy Day
on Jan. 28, follow the Federal Trade Commission's December call for a "do not
track" mechanism that would let users restrict advertisers from collecting
information about Web searches they make, Websites they visit and links they
click.
Both Mozilla's and Chrome's tools are flawed in the sense that, while they are
easy to enable and install, consumers simply won't be aware of them. Beyond
pop-up messages or word of mouth, it's unlikely either company will advertise
the availability of tracking opt-outs as a great thing for consumers to try.
But which one is better, if there is a "better" for any such
solutions bolted on instead of baked in from the start?
Mozilla Technology and Privacy Officer Alex Fowler argued that blocking ads at
the header is both easy to use and a more persistent opt-out mechanism compared
with ad cookie-crunching methods or blacklists. Ars Technica offered a fine technical drill-down into the difference between
Mozilla's and Google's approaches.
Privacy advocates from the Electronic Frontier Foundation prefer Mozilla's
header approach. EFF advocate Rainey Reitman noted that cookie-based opt-out schemes are complex because
companies need to opt in before it can work and new types of cookie need to be
created for each of them.
Moreover, privacy-conscious users delete their cookies regularly, which means
the opt-out keeps turning itself off. Finally, these cookie-based solutions
allow fake opt-outs that protect users from targeted ads but don't prohibit
online tracking.
So much for the approaches by the NAI and Google. A Google spokesperson
stressed that the Chrome cookie cutter is "just a first step" and
defended the fact that it only enables tracking opt-out from the existing NAI
members.
"We think it's more effective to begin with what currently exists so that
there is a real tool in the marketplace that users can use right now,"
Google said.
"All of the major ad networks are already members of the NAI. ... We're
building on that work by offering this extension. And as always, our engineers
are always looking into new tools to give people more transparency and control
over their online privacy."
 |