Poll Shows Developer Support for GPLv3

 
 
By Peter Galli  |  Posted 2007-04-20 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Some open-source developers believe that the upcoming GNU GPLv3 will be good for open-source software, but they are concerned about its patent and digital rights management provisions.

A recent poll of some open-source developers found that while nearly half of the respondents believe that the upcoming GNU General Public License Version 3 will be good for open-source software, they are concerned about the patent, device, and digital rights management provisions in the recently released third draft of the license. The poll was conducted by OpenLogic, a Broomfield, Colo.-based provider of enterprise open-source software, in the days following the release of the third draft of the GPLv3.
The company surveyed its Expert Community members, many of whom contribute to several open-source products.
Stormy Peters, OpenLogics director of community and partner programs, told eWEEK that the company conducted the poll to take the pulse of open-source developers and give their opinions a voice. Peters said that while the company "cant say with scientific certainty if this would map to a survey of hundreds of thousands of open-source developers, we do believe that the OpenLogic Expert Community is representative of open-source developers." Corporate reaction to GPLv3 draft 3 was swift, and critical. Click here to read more.
Some 50 OpenLogic Expert Community members responded to the poll, with 47 percent saying they believed the new GPL would be good for open-source software, and just 14 percent saying that it would not be. However, there was a fair amount of uncertainty about the impact of the license, with nearly 33 percent saying they were unsure whether it would be good for the community or not. Six percent had no opinion either way. The respondents were also concerned by several of the provisions found in the third draft, which was released earlier this month. Some 59 percent were concerned about provisions around patent issues, 53 percent were worried by the provisions around digital rights management, and 40 percent were concerned with the provisions around the use of GPL-covered programs in consumer devices. These are all provisions that have been controversial from the first draft of the license. The developers are not alone in their concerns. A lawyer for ACT, the Association for Competitive Technology, has warned of the legal risks associated with the third draft of the license, an argument that open-source luminary Bruce Perens has strongly disagreed with. How late could GPLv3 be? Click here to read more. Less than half the respondents (36 percent) currently work only on projects already licensed under GPLv2, but if the 18 percent of respondents who work on projects that are licensed under GPLv2 and other licenses are added in, the number rises to 54 percent. This compares with 46 percent of respondents who do not work on any projects licensed under GPLv2. Asked why this number was so low, OpenLogics Peters said that the open-source packages represented in its library were based on requests from its enterprise customers. "Weve found that the open-source packages used by enterprises are less likely to be GPL than the overall population of open-source packages," she said. When poll respondents were asked whether they would support a move to GPLv3 for projects they worked on that were already licensed under GPLv2, based on the third draft of that license, 36 percent said they would, 25 percent said they would not, and another 25 percent said they would in some cases. Fourteen percent said they did not know. Asked how long they thought it would take for those projects to switch over to the GPLv3 once it is released, 23 percent said within six months, 46 percent said between six and twelve months, and 31 percent said more than a year. Click here to read more about how some open-source companies are rewarding developers with Microsoft Xboxes. The results will have no effect on OpenLogic going forward, Peters said, as the company delivers and supports a library of hundreds of the most popular open-source software packages. "The OpenLogic Library includes open-source packages that are licensed under a wide variety of open-source licenses. We will also include open-source packages under GPLv3 in our library," she said. OpenLogic also believed that the third draft of GPLv3 was an improvement over the second draft for most enterprise users of open source as it clarifies some issues about whether Web-based applications are considered distributions. It also narrows some of the patent clauses that could have impacted open-source contributions, she said. OpenLogics library has more than 200 certified open-source software packages. Click here to read more. Asked if she was surprised by any of the poll results, Peters said she was. "We found that although open-source developers have concerns about patent, DRM and device provisions of GPLv3, by a 3-to-1 ratio, they still feel that the GPLv3 is good for open source. We were also surprised at the high percentage of open-source developers who would advocate moving their GPLv2 packages to GPLv3," she said. Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.
 
 
 
 
Peter Galli has been a financial/technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has been Investment Editor of South Africa's Business Day Newspaper, the sister publication of the Financial Times of London.

He was also Group Financial Communications Manager for First National Bank, the second largest banking group in South Africa before moving on to become Executive News Editor of Business Report, the largest daily financial newspaper in South Africa, owned by the global Independent Newspapers group.

He was responsible for a national reporting team of 20 based in four bureaus. He also edited and contributed to its weekly technology page, and launched a financial and technology radio service supplying daily news bulletins to the national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, which were then distributed to some 50 radio stations across the country.

He was then transferred to San Francisco as Business Report's U.S. Correspondent to cover Silicon Valley, trade and finance between the US, Europe and emerging markets like South Africa. After serving that role for more than two years, he joined eWeek as a Senior Editor, covering software platforms in August 2000.

He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise.

He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.

His interviews with senior industry executives include Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Linus Torvalds, the original developer of the Linux operating system, Sun CEO Scot McNealy, and Bill Zeitler, a senior vice president at IBM.

For numerous examples of his writing you can search under his name at the eWEEK Website at www.eweek.com.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date
Rocket Fuel