White Paper Attacks GPL

The debate over open-source software and the commonly used GNU General Public License erupted again with Tuesdays release of a 17-page white paper from the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution.

The institution, a Washington think tank that is partly funded by Microsoft Corp., released the paper written by its president, Kenneth Brown, and titled "Opening the Open Source Debate."

The paper repeats many of Microsofts arguments around open source and the GPL, stating that while open source is helpful to the global software industry as a development model, the GPL holds many risks and threatens the cooperation between different parties collaborating to create new technologies.

While the paper noted that software distributed under the BSD license is very popular and enables companies, independent developers and the academic community to fluidly exchange software source code, it said the GPLs resistance to the commonplace exchange of open-source and proprietary code has the potential to negatively impact the research and development budgets of companies.

IBM, Sun Microsystems Inc. and Microsoft alone spent more than $10 billion annually on research and development. "It stands to reason that if the ownership of intellectual property is affected, dollars spent on research and development would be at risk as well.

"Removing the economic incentive for firms to own the rights to products spawned from research and development programs is the surest way to end their existence. The GPL has many risks, but the greatest is its threat to the cooperation between different parties who collaborate and create new technologies," the paper said.

Today, government, commercial enterprises, academicians and others have a system to converge. "Conversely, the GPL represents divergence; proposing to remove the current infrastructure of intellectual property rights, enforceable protection and economic incentive," Brown wrote.

But Bradley Kuhn, executive director of the Free Software Foundation, the creator and advocate of the GPL, hit back, saying the paper is "nothing more than fear-mongering using the same tired, old misinformation.

"It is not surprising that companies like Microsoft and other corporate forces that want to see free software stopped funded this paper in part. The report is essentially a continuation of the rumors already out there for many months now," Kuhn told eWEEK.

The GNU GPL protects global cooperation and is designed specifically to make sure that those who benefit from the software are required to give back to the community, he said.

While the paper acknowledged that open source could coexist with the status quo, it made clear that "GPL cannot coexist with traditional open source or proprietary source code." As such, the continued use of GPL open source deserves further study and around certain considerations, the paper said. These include the following:

Review: OpenOffice.org: Serious Suite Alternative

Reader Comments: White Paper Attacks GPL >>> Be the FIRST to comment on this article!

>>> More Application Development Articles          >>> More By Peter Galli