Some Companies Are Attaching Their Facilities to Dirty Energy Sources

By Michelle Maisto  |  Posted 2012-04-18 Print this article Print

Some data centers, it adds, consume the equivalent of nearly 180,000 homes.

While awareness is growing about the issue, €œmany IT companies are simply choosing to attach their modern information factories to some of the dirtiest sources of electricity, supplied by some of the dirtiest utilities on the planet,€ states the report.

In India, for example, a booming telecom market is attracting big investors and hurrying new players to launch services. Of India€™s existing 400,000 mobile towers, more than 70 percent are in rural or semi-rural areas where grid-connected electricity is not reliable or not available.

€œAs a result, mobile towers and, increasingly, grid-connected towers in these areas rely on diesel generators to power their network operations,€ states the report. €œThe consumption of diesel by the telecoms sector currently stands at a staggering 3 billion liters annually€”second only to the railways in India.€

Telecoms and major companies leading such network expansion in developing markets, said Greenpeace, €œmust choose solar power to begin the transition to a clean energy-powered network €¦ instead of repeating the centralized dirty energy production model of the developed world.€

Greenpeace also calls for greater transparency. With only Akami revealing CUE scores, many companies instead like to point to their power usage effectiveness (PUE), a metric that doesn€™t truly speak to a data center€™s performance or resource consumption. For the most part, this practice is motivated by businesses not wanting its competitors to have insight into the scale of their infrastructure, their performance or their cost structure.

€œGoogle, Akami, Salesforce, Yahoo and Rackspace are all beginning to reveal more meaningful consumption and carbon-performance data associated with their clouds, but these are thus far exceptions,€ said Greenpeace.

While only Akami received an A rating for Energy Transparency, in a scorecard of 14 major players, Amazon and Twitter received Fs. Google received the only A under a €œRenewables & Advocacy€ section, and the nicest €œreport card€ overall, with an A, two B€™s and a C.

Under €œInfrastructure Siting,€ another area for industry improvement, the highest grades, two B€™s, went to Facebook and Yahoo.

€œRenewable electricity procurement options for a data center operator are hugely dependent upon the location of the data center and its proximity to renewable energy-generation capacity,€ Greenpeace explains. €œThis is justification for a strong infrastructure-siting policy. Strategic infrastructure siting allows IT companies to buy clean energy directly from the local grid.€

Finally, companies also need to be industry leaders and advocates for clean energy, says Greenpeace.

€œThey can do this by helping to bring more renewable energy online through purchase power, investment and advocacy,€ it explains, €œyet few companies have demonstrated the bold leadership necessary to ensure that IT€™s rampant growth will be sustained by clean energy sources.€


Michelle Maisto has been covering the enterprise mobility space for a decade, beginning with Knowledge Management, Field Force Automation and eCRM, and most recently as the editor-in-chief of Mobile Enterprise magazine. She earned an MFA in nonfiction writing from Columbia University, and in her spare time obsesses about food. Her first book, The Gastronomy of Marriage, if forthcoming from Random House in September 2009.

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel