Microsoft's Cloudy Thinking Complicates Windows 8 Development (
Page 1 of 2 )
When Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer told an
audience at the Gartner Symposium / IT Expo that the company’s riskiest
bet was the next version of Windows, he caused a great deal of
consternation – especially since he declined to elaborate.
Former chief architect Ray Ozzie, a couple of days after leaving
Microsoft, added his thoughts on the challenges for Microsoft, saying
that the company had to embrace the cloud as its future direction.
Ozzie and other Microsoft executives that
haven’t retired are, if anything, out of touch with the bulk of the
user base for Windows. Remember that something like 60 percent of
computer users are still running Windows XP nearly a decade after it
arrived on the scene. Despite the fact that you can’t actually buy XP
any more, and despite the fact that Microsoft will stop supporting it
in a couple of years, the switch hasn’t yet been made.
To assume that the world’s computer users will
obediently transition to Windows 7, or later to Windows 8, is a
mistake. Worse, to assume that the world is going to make a global move
to the cloud, and that Windows must move with it, is worse than a
mistake–it’s based on elitist assumptions about how people use their
computers. Sure, you can move to the cloud if you live in highly wired
Redmond, Wash. For that matter, you might be able to move to the
cloud here in the Washington, D.C., suburbs.
But most of the world doesn’t live in places
like those and even in places where broadband access is available,
it’s not necessarily affordable. The cloud is a resource only for those
who can afford it, and most of the world can’t. In fact, part of the
reason that so much of the world is using Windows XP is because they
can’t afford the computers it takes to run anything later. When you
travel through places that don’t have the wealth of the urban U.S. or
Western Europe, you find that the world still connects at the pace of
an analog modem, when it connects at all.