|
|
|

NetApp Should Consider Another Acquisition, Experts Advise
By: Chris Preimesberger
2009-07-09
Article Rating:    / 5
There are 8 user comments on this Data Storage, Data Backup and Storage Virtualization story.
NetApp Should Consider Another Acquisition, Experts Advise (
Page 1 of 3 ) Several storage industry analysts tell eWEEK they believe NetApp should take a breather and then pursue an acquisition that makes senseone that it can afford yet one that will help the data storage company broaden its market opportunities and keep growing.In the wake of what certainly had to be a crushing blow to NetApp's strategic
plansnot to mention its corporate egowhen EMC
outbid it for Data Domain, the question remaining is this: What happens
next for NetApp, the network-attached-storage pioneer that used to be known as
simply a "good
little file server maker"?
"Regroup, don't rush into [the] next acquisition too quickly so that it
looks reactionary, take a bit of timehowever, not too long[then] get back up
and try riding (or castrating) that bull again," Greg Schulz, founder and
senior analyst at StorageIO, suggested
to eWEEK.
That sentence summed up the perspectives of a number of other storage experts
contacted by eWEEK. (By the way, Schulz was referring to NetApp co-founder
Dave Hitz' recently published book, "How
to Castrate a Bull: Unexpected Lessons on Risk, Growth and Success in
Business.")
In this decade, NetApp
has become successful in providing storage for large IT-based corporations,
such as Oracle and Yahoo, and for a wide range of enterprises of different
sizes in a number of vertical markets. It has climbed up to become the world's
second-largest independent storage company, at about $3 billion yearly in
revenuesecond only to EMC
itself.
Over time, NetApp has continued to improve its position in the world storage
software market to rank behind only EMC, Symantec and IBM. Top external disk
storage supplier EMC and fifth-place NetApp have been posting double-digit
revenue growth for the last few years, up until 2009 and the world recession.
Even with that huge challenge, their single-digit profit numbers still are
excellent.
EMC went to extra trouble to establish its own separate subsidiary, Envoy
Merger, for the specific purpose of landing the acquisition of relatively small
($300 million yearly sales) Data Domain: It obviously wanted the midmarket
sales potential that Data Domain representsat all costs.
Why? Two key reasons: One, Data Domain has excellent software and loyal clients
in the midmarket, which is precisely where EMC wants to keep expanding; and, two,
a combined NetApp/Data Domain would have had the potential to dominate the small
and midsize business markets in a few years.
Along with consumers, SMBs will be creating the lion's share of the world's
data over the next 10 years. Someone's got to store all that content somewhere.
EMC, with Data Domain, is now much better prepared to sell into those sectors.
The company is expected to maintain Data Domain as an independent, recognizable
brand, and to retain as many current field staff people as it can employ.
 |
|
|
x}ks6*Q3{L=RJmlki;[HHbL\#'ΗSOx-=g-`n4w~ IM˙s\ؔ]sPç$]2Y*_
d&@jہ )}mk4uBZ ;=>;|9|AL =TadF,ljw|Jh\@Fܨ_Z``1Zt|Rl j9iݒ |i @I>R(h]
](
Ѽ{eM'QR`N
Cw.uj9QCRV2/FXDP~L&DMcZ?9;z'CZp_CGaiZgdl
vuH`Uƞfn
m`䅰Y(0F.ČuI%iԈIdZ"[;dTZwc63!1kT%R>l@G-> H PlN$+AaSGYHo*!)lV=TK
=~b[4p\.ܺn?Aס}=-:֍.,|,U4eNDj%o~cn>LjZu|:iCY͢.`F3l˸):4
HS+VWR\m(Ƒxxg9{ؖp*s1_~)UUq>},GAݍƶ mh[Iw^ր8\!ꞝǭk9C$HcA~N7&V)UjT:( |aBj@tzXw|\3a7nJQn4E;J
KHs=
(2 ,4Y{aG~6t/ݫ˫ޠKݓW)7fٚYjiUd\]3Lo-Uiw_itz'gw:Sڟ/+̪?ZU?{_CMnXCE C0JCR?#3?_v,.?NHA҉,w3`םBm۲ܽ(BZKEן+a(7fhX@ ?$eR2~&s* 1@/ )446
t-ͨn
#di&.fh-
Aho*K>LrM&@Sk~ $GM]5ņ])!etFS۴/^$P!P샖_.[ jNTwEQS'{L^"ʥ2`g^bnFsY4l= .k\G#tڪ9Q[k+\M}0eя{ZVp3mvÏW\/}t0*>c]݈f%",Qqsu\StjFb:??JjGexQio+r%(Lf[ԑplPòǔI'z 6aϩ>b뎓z>:AG:ڴ;\ZP7fh`CzCҏ&mЀ
'p'bdx c
04&ztH۠h&r |