EFF Concerned with Latitude Location History

 
 
By Clint Boulton  |  Posted 2009-11-14 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


When eWEEK pointed out how a status update from Facebook freed a teen from wrongful imprisonment and that Google Latitude Location History could be used for similar purposes, Bankston said the usefulness of the features are poor trade-offs considering the risks to user privacy.  

Bankston admitted he was pleased Google made Latitude's location history an "opt-in" feature and that users can delete all or part of their history at any time. He still prefers that Google stay out of the location history business because the legal compliance issue could pose a problem for Latitude users.

"What is Google's position if the government or a civil litigant comes knocking? We think that under federal privacy law, the government would have to get a warrant for stored locations less than 181 days old while civil litigants would not be able to access them at all. But we don't have any public indication from Google that it has taken that position."

Moreover, Bankston said that even if this is Google's position, strong warrant protection disappears at 180 days, after which the government can use only a subpoena to get this data. He would like Google to create a default feature so that user locations are deleted after 180 days unless users explicitly change their settings to some other expiration date. 

eWEEK asked Google if it is making any changes to the way it will handle Latitude Location History info if law enforcement folks come knocking.

A Google spokesperson told eWEEK: "Google complies with valid legal process, such as court orders and subpoenas. ... At the same time we have a legal team whose job is to scrutinize these requests and make sure they meet not only the letter but the spirit of the law."

When asked specifically if Google will require a warrant for Latitude Location History, as it promised to do when Latitude launched, the spokesperson declined to answer the question directly, replying:

"When a Google Latitude subscriber communicates his or her location in Latitude, Google believes that the information should receive the same special protections as other communications content."

This is slippery; Google is implying that it would request warrants from law enforcement officials seeking Latitude info, but it isn't explicitly promising to do so.

Bankston also wants more clarity from Google. We'll see if he gets it. In the meantime, you have to think the exoneration in the Facebook robbery case will only heighten law enforcement officials' and litigators' interest in using social networking tools as evidence.

Latitude, with Location History, would have a big bulls-eye on its back, especially if Google will not require warrants to cough up user data.




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel