IBM, Microsoft Square Off on Data Storage Battlefield

 
 
By Lisa Vaas  |  Posted 2006-04-07 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IBM squashes storage needs in Viper, while Microsoft is finally ready to ship production-ready database mirroring in SQL Server 2005 SP1.

The database titans are at it again, duking it out this time in the realm of storage and backup. For its part, IBM on April 6 told eWEEK in an interview that Viper, its upcoming update to its DB2 database server software, has been infused with technology that compresses data throughout the system, including on disk and in memory, thus resulting in a 54 percent savings on storage costs with no performance hit.
On the same day, Microsofts Paul Flessner, senior vice president of data and storage platforms, announced that SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 1—due at months end—will ship with the final version of database mirroring. Database mirroring is a long-anticipated feature—many listed it as their top pick on the long list of coming attractions in the next-generation SQL Server 2005—that didnt ship in a final, production-ready form when SQL Server 2005 first came out.
Database mirroring is similar to Oracle Data Guards physical standby feature, but seemingly better at failback than Data Guard, according to independent analyst and eWEEK contributing columnist Charlie Garry. "It is an improvement over basic log shipping because it streams the active log changes," Garry wrote in an October column. "This could support both high availability or disaster recovery scenarios." In sketching the road map for Microsofts long-term data storage vision, Flessner hyped database mirroring as part and parcel of Microsofts attention to the cost of storage. In a SQL Server 2005 update letter sent out to promote his talk, he said storage costs continue to be on "an amazing trajectory. "One could reasonably expect that the cost of a terabyte will be reduced from about $1,000 today to $100 in 2007," he wrote. "Historical trends imply that in 20 years or less, we will be able to store literally everything digitally, and the petabyte will be a standard measure of personal storage."
Perhaps storage will be cheaper, but managing that data wont necessarily drop in cost. Database mirroring will serve as one aspect of making sure businesses maintain high availability to access that data. "As we move from managing transactional data to pre-transactional, as with RFID and other sensors, we will face a 10-100 factor increase in data volume," Flessner wrote. "As an industry we are facing an unprecedented explosion of data that we will need to manage, with the ability to organize, summarize and prioritize all of this information becoming a key priority for IT." Next Page: IBM pitches Vipers XML-handling capabilities.



 
 
 
 
Lisa Vaas is News Editor/Operations for eWEEK.com and also serves as editor of the Database topic center. Since 1995, she has also been a Webcast news show anchorperson and a reporter covering the IT industry. She has focused on customer relationship management technology, IT salaries and careers, effects of the H1-B visa on the technology workforce, wireless technology, security, and, most recently, databases and the technologies that touch upon them. Her articles have appeared in eWEEK's print edition, on eWEEK.com, and in the startup IT magazine PC Connection. Prior to becoming a journalist, Vaas experienced an array of eye-opening careers, including driving a cab in Boston, photographing cranky babies in shopping malls, selling cameras, typography and computer training. She stopped a hair short of finishing an M.A. in English at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. She earned a B.S. in Communications from Emerson College. She runs two open-mic reading series in Boston and currently keeps bees in her home in Mashpee, Mass.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel