The database vendor says doesn't fear open-source competition and it will continue to go to market with vertical industry solutions that solve specific business problems.
Oracle is holding its own in the open-source database space, while not seeing any competition in the enterprise database market from open-source companies, Bob Shimp, the vice president of Oracles technology business unit, told eWEEK July 31.
It is also not seeing increased competition as a result of Red Hats acquisition of JBoss earlier in 2006. But all of that does not mean that Oracle, headquartered in Redwood Shores, Calif., is becoming complacent or scaling back its focus on Linux and open-source development work, Shimp said.
"The open-source databases have been around for some 10 years and are applicable primarily in instances where there are highly partitionable small database applications, often caching or Web site catalogs with heavy reads and transactional processing," he said.
The Berkeley DB product is doing well in that space, Shimp said, adding that the most notable thing for customers was that nothing had changed, which was what the company wanted.
"We wanted to have the Berkeley DB product line complement our existing offerings to customers while making no changes that the community would even notice," he said, noting that the acquisition had helped Oracle reach smaller customers that it might not have been able to before, as well as contribute enterprise technologies to the community to help make those projects more easily available to enterprise customers.
"The end result has been a win-win for everyone, as we provide a lot more value to customers, and enterprises are adopting and adapting both types of technologies for running their business," Shimp said.
Berkeley DB is a popular and good technology for caching, middle-tier databases and embedded database applications, and "we have to compete aggressively in places like the embedded database business, which is growing rapidly," he said.
Read more here about how Oracle is "losing patience" with XenSource and VMware.
But Oracle is not seeing any of the open-source databases even remotely approaching the enterprise database market as yet, he said.
"There are just too many capabilities needed that they just dont compete in, and if you look at the general database market overall, you will find that other categorybesides Oracle, IBM and Microsoftthis has continually shrunk over time as there were more capabilities being built into the enterprise database applications that they have to cover," he said.
But that means that industry players like Oracle have to constantly raise the bar and deliver new value "or you deserve to be overtaken by someone else," Shimp said.
Asked how Oracles relationship with Red Hat may have changed since Red Hat acquired JBoss, which Oracle was reported to have been considering buying, Shimp said there had been no change whatsoever.
Will Red Hat lose powerful friends with its JBoss buy? Click here to read more.
"There is almost no company in the software industry that you can name that Oracle doesnt both compete with and partner with, and our relationship with Red Hat is no different [from] those we have with Microsoft or IBM or [Hewlett-Packard] or anybody else. We have learned how to successfully manage those relationships and grow the business, and our Linux business is very strategic to us and we are going to ensure that it is highly successful, no matter what it takes," he said.
Next Page: Oracles open-standards philosophy.
Peter Galli has been a financial/technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has been Investment Editor of South Africa's Business Day Newspaper, the sister publication of the Financial Times of London.
He was also Group Financial Communications Manager for First National Bank, the second largest banking group in South Africa before moving on to become Executive News Editor of Business Report, the largest daily financial newspaper in South Africa, owned by the global Independent Newspapers group.
He was responsible for a national reporting team of 20 based in four bureaus. He also edited and contributed to its weekly technology page, and launched a financial and technology radio service supplying daily news bulletins to the national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, which were then distributed to some 50 radio stations across the country.
He was then transferred to San Francisco as Business Report's U.S. Correspondent to cover Silicon Valley, trade and finance between the US, Europe and emerging markets like South Africa. After serving that role for more than two years, he joined eWeek as a Senior Editor, covering software platforms in August 2000.
He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise.
He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.
His interviews with senior industry executives include Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Linus Torvalds, the original developer of the Linux operating system, Sun CEO Scot McNealy, and Bill Zeitler, a senior vice president at IBM.
For numerous examples of his writing you can search under his name at the eWEEK Website at www.eweek.com.