Page Two

By eweek  |  Posted 2002-10-10 Print this article Print

: Barrett Interview"> eWEEK: Banias is the code name of the mobile chip youll be rolling out early next year. Can you elaborate on how it supports wireless communications? Barrett: Youll have support of dual-band 802.11a and 802.11b with the Banias architecture. The architecture consists not only of the processor but also the peripheral chips.
The platform of the future will have all the connectivity built-in. Bluetooth, wired and wireless, both wide-area network and local-area network.
eWEEK: The Tablet PC is getting a big rollout next month. Do you see that having an impact on chip sales? Barrett: Its hard to tell. However, any innovation is good for the industry. If you ask me what I want built into a system, Id want wireless capability rather than handwriting recognition [as in the tablet]. But the tablet is a new usage paradigm, and usage models will vary with the individual. eWEEK: Carbon nanotubes and quantum computing are the buzz for tomorrow. Do those technologies consume a certain percentage of your research and development? Barrett: Were pursuing most of those activities in conjunction with universities. Its a relatively small part of our direct R&D budget. Those technologies are very much in the exploratory phase. The expensive part is the pre-commercialization phase, where it costs hundreds of millions of dollars. eWEEK: With the cost of building a fabrication plant in the billions of dollars, are we reaching a cost limit for semiconductor makers? Barrett: This is déjà vu all over again. Back in the 90s when we got to the first billion-dollar fab, everyone said we would have only five megafabs around the world. But then there were 150 more fabs built around the world. The issue is not so much what these things cost but whether you can get a return on your investment. Its safe to say that fewer and fewer companies will be building their own factories because of the cost. Theres a lot of discussion about joint ventures and foundries. But we think there is a tight correlation between the design, the process technology and the manufacturing. We think controlling those gives us a performance advantage. eWEEK: Are you a believer in grid computing? What impact will grid computing have in Intels future? Barrett: Grid computing tries to harness unused computing power to make a more powerful computer. Weve had a huge over-investment in optical fiber capacity. Thats a way to hook up computer centers and make grid computing work. But you go back to the local level, and grid computing has been around for a long time. We wire together 12,000 engineering workstations at Intel. That could be the largest supercomputer in the world. Our industry is famous for rediscovering and repackaging things. The concept of distributed and parallel computing is not new. I believe in it--yes; were using it, yes. Is it real? Yes. Is it new? Its not that new. eWEEK: Looking into the future, youve said that Moores Law, as we know it, will continue for 10 to 15 years. Are you familiar with Kurzweils Law, which says that three-dimensional molecular computing will grow at an even faster rate? Barrett: Were getting three-dimensional atomic computing today. Theres been a lot of talk about molecular computing and the impact it could have. Despite what the basic computing element is, you still have to interface and have communication with those compute elements. Its the same challenge we have in wiring together five hundred million transistors on the next-generation Itanium processor. If youre going to have three-dimensional organic biological molecular compute elements, you still have to get information in and out. So Im more concerned about the global wiring diagram to make it useful. You can shrink the transistor, but you still have to communicate with the transistor.


Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel