Will Palms Foleo Fulfill Its Promises?

 
 
By Jason Brooks  |  Posted 2007-06-06 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

This device may succeed where others have failed.

Ive been burned more than once by lighter-than-laptop computing devices that have failed to fulfill their promise. Still, I cant help but be excited about Palms Foleo mobile companion. The 2.5-pound device, which Palm announced recently and plans to begin shipping later this summer, will sport the display and keyboard of a typical notebook computer and the battery life and instant on/off capability of a handheld device.
This mix of features is what Ive long sought in a mobile computer: something thats functional enough to write and browse with, but light enough to carry everywhere without stopping to calculate whether the added load is worth the typically short run-time delivered by notebook batteries.
As I mentioned, however, Ive been disappointed before. Take my IBM z50 Workpad, a pleasantly shrunken Thinkpad that weighed about 2.5 pounds, and carried a very nice keyboard and a passably large 640x480-pixel display. However, despite its form-factor attributes, the z50 fell far short of its promise, and was discontinued very shortly after it began shipping. The z50s biggest problems were software related—and the same goes for most other devices of this type. For starters, the z50 shipped with the lousy Windows CE 2.11, which sported so-so Pocket Office applications, a terrible version of Pocket Internet Explorer and not much else. Back in 1999, when the Workpad z50 first shipped, the market for mobile device software was small compared to that for desktop and notebook computers, and things havent changed too much in the years since.
With so many different form factors and resource profiles, its tough to build applications that will run on many different devices, and theres so much change in the mobile device space that users are in constant danger of seeing their devices drop out of application support matrices. For the z50, there was never an upgrade path to access the improvements that Microsoft subsequently made to Windows CE, as IBM discontinued the product almost immediately, and Microsoft dumped the MIPS architecture that powered the z50 in favor of a focus solely on ARM chips. Now, I was aware of the z50s software failings when I picked one up in 2001 for about a fifth of what it originally had sold for, but I had plans to work around WinCE. I ran NetBSD on the z50 for a time, but the arrangement never worked well enough to make it past the hacky-experimental stages with me. The fact that I was able to load a real operating system onto my z50 didnt mean the device was capable of running that operating system well. After all, these sorts of devices are, by definition, underpowered compared to regular notebooks, which means that even if youre able to get your hands on some decent software, you cant necessarily expect your super-mobile computer to run the software well. I dont expect Palms forthcoming mobile companion to boast a broad catalog of made-for-Foleo applications, and even though the products Linux innards will likely allow for more software flexibility than weve seen from other devices of this sort, Im not banking on that flexibility either. Rather, what makes me most optimistic that the Foleo might succeed where other products have failed is the Foleos apparent fitness as a simple terminal for Web-based applications. Even if the rest of the software that ships with the Foleo ends up stinking, as long as the device gets the browser part right, itll offer users a way around the resource, application and upgrade limitations that have held back its predecessors. Based on what Palm has announced about the Foleo so far, it looks as though the device will have what it takes to do the Web well: The Foleo will ship with a Web browser from Opera; with a 1024x600-pixel display that will render Web pages without weird reformatting; and with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi radios for Internet connectivity. In order for the Foleo really to shine, its browser will need to offer some sort of offline application support, the likes of which Google is beta-testing now in the form of its Gears project (see Jims story in C). Opera has stated that its working on offline application support, but well have to wait and see how that shakes out. Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news in desktop and notebook computing.
 
 
 
 
As Editor in Chief of eWEEK Labs, Jason Brooks manages the Labs team and is responsible for eWEEK's print edition. Brooks joined eWEEK in 1999, and has covered wireless networking, office productivity suites, mobile devices, Windows, virtualization, and desktops and notebooks. Jason's coverage is currently focused on Linux and Unix operating systems, open-source software and licensing, cloud computing and Software as a Service. Follow Jason on Twitter at jasonbrooks, or reach him by email at jbrooks@eweek.com.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date
Rocket Fuel