Customer Respect Group Rates CRM Vendors

 
 
By Renee Boucher Ferguson  |  Posted 2006-05-12 Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

On-demand and on-premises vendors fare poorly in one-on-one communication.

The Customer Respect Group, an IT research firm, will publish May 15 the results of a study that ranks leading customer relationship management vendors—both on-demand and on-premises providers—on how well they treat their online customers. The report, sponsored by on-demand sales methodology company Select Selling, reveals poor marks for one-on-one communications and mixed results in trust and site usability, among other variables scored, officials said. "CRM vendors were surprisingly poor communicating with the Web visitor, something that goes against the message they communicate," said Terry Golesworthy, president of the Customer Respect Group, in a statement.
"The fact that 27 percent of e-mail questions were ignored completely is an amazing statistic for the industry; a cynic might suggest that internal CRM systems are poor."
To Golesworthys way of thinking, the way a CRM vendor treats its own customers is a "leading indicator" as to how well they understand the customer relationship. The study compared services from on-premises and on-demand vendors, providing each with a Customer Respect Index score. The companies include, in order of their overall CRI ranking: Salesforce.com (which rated the highest at 6.7 out of 10 possible points), RightNow Technologies on-demand (6.6), SAP on-demand (6.4), Maximizer Software on-premises (6.2), Oracle on-premises (6.1), SalesNet on-demand and FrontRange Solutions on-premises (both 5.8), Pivotal on-premises (5.6), NetSuite on-demand (5.5), Microsoft on-premises (5.2), AmDocs on-premises (5.1), Siebel/Oracle on-demand (4.9), Sage on-premises (4.7), and Sugar on-demand (4.5). To read more about SAPs marketing suite for CRM on-demand, click here. Companies that scored above 7 are rated "excellent" by CRG. Those pulling down scores of 6.25 to 6.99 are rated "good," while anything below 5.0—Oracle on-demand, Sage and Sugar—is rated "needs improvement" to "poor." To figure out which attributes to measure online service by, Ipswich, Mass.-based CRG interviewed users on a continuous basis, and benchmarked more than 2,500 corporate Web sites across a gamut of industries. (In its most recent survey, more than half the respondents said a poor Web site experience has a "major impact" on how they view a company, its reputation and image.) The Customer Respect study looked at three main points: site usability, communication and trust. Next Page: Other industries.



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel