REVIEW: Version 3.1 of the open-source OpenOffice.org productivity suite provides plenty of feature and performance enhancements. The performance of the Calc spreadsheet program has been notably improved, as has rendering of on-screen objects in the Impress presentation app. The Write word processor offers new collaboration functionality.It's been less than a year since Sun Microsystems OpenOffice.org
hit its major 3.0 release, but the next version of the open-source,
cross-platform-friendly productivity suite is already available,
complete with a slate of feature enhancements and performance tweaks.
After testing OpenOffice.org 3.1 on both Windows XP and Ubuntu Linux
systems, I found Version 3.1 a worthwhile upgrade, particularly for
those who work with charts and graphics within their documents,
spreadsheets and presentations. (OpenOffice 3.1 is also available for
Apple's OS X and Sun's Solaris.)
Click here to see an eWEEK Labs slide show of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
Featurewise, OpenOffice.org 3.1 matches up fairly well with
Microsoft's Office. In addition, between the work that the
OpenOffice.org team has done to make its suite compatible with Office's
traditional binary and newer, XML-based formats and the work that Microsoft has
done to make Office 2007 compatible with the OpenDocument format, these rival
suites can coexist more peacefully than ever.
With that said, the only way to truly determine whether
OpenOffice.org can serve as a replacement for--or complement
to--Microsoft Office in your organization is to try out the suite with
your own documents and processes. Since OpenOffice.org is free to
download and use, the barrier to trying it out is rather low.
Calc Faster, Friendlier
Some of the most dramatic enhancements in OpenOffice.org 3.1 involve
the performance boosts that the project's developers have managed to
wring out of the suite's spreadsheet component, Calc. In particular,
the team addressed the so-called Zaske Case,
in which a spreadsheet with many formulas referencing the same range of
cells took much longer to process changes in that range than did
Microsoft's Excel.
In Version 3.1, the OpenOffice.org team erased this gap by
broadcasting cell changes to affected formulas in bulk, rather than
through repetitive broadcasts. In my tests, a recalculation that took
14 seconds on Calc Version 3.0 took 1 second on Version 3.1.
Another notable improvement in Calc 3.1 involves the application's
row-sorting toolbar control, which now behaves more sanely by default.
When I hit one of the sort buttons in Calc's toolbar, the application
correctly identified my column headers and sorted the data beneath them
accordingly. In Version 3.0, the sort buttons paid no heed to my
headers, requiring me to visit a sort dialog to tell Calc that headers
were present.
Elsewhere in Calc, the spreadsheet application has picked up the
view-zooming slider control that debuted in OpenOffice.org's Writer
3.0, which saves a trip to the application's view dialog. Along similar
lines, Calc has adopted Excel's style of sheet renamingI could
double-click on a sheet tab to rename it, rather than do the deed
through a right-click menu.
I also appreciated Calc 3.1's new formula tool tips, which would pop
up after I began typing in a formula to remind me of the proper syntax
for the function at hand.
Graphics Goods
Another notable enhancement in OpenOffice.org 3.1 is the suite's
improved rendering of on-screen graphics through anti-aliasing, an
advance that applies to the entire suite but that should prove
particularly pleasing to users of the product's presentation component,
Impress. In previous versions of OpenOffice.org, graphics such as
circles and other basic shapes tended to render with somewhat jagged
borders, which could give documents an unfinished look.
I opened a sample PowerPoint presentation within Impress 3.0. While
Impress did a good job with the document's formatting, the shapes
within the presentation looked noticeably rougher than in
PowerPointeffectively snatching defeat from the jaws of format
fidelity victory. I opened the same document using Impress 3.1 and
found that the edges of the shapes within rendered just as smoothly as
in Microsoft PowerPoint.
While working with the same presentation, I dragged one of my shapes
around on the document and watched as Impress 3.1 displayed a
translucent, shadow version of the object, complete with the text
that the shape contained. In contrast, Impress 3.0 displayed an empty
frame during dragging operations, and PowerPoint 2007 displayed a
shadow image of the shape but one that lacked the attached text.
The Write Stuff
Version 3.0 of OpenOffice.org's word processor, Writer, introduced
Microsoft Office-style comments in the margins of a document. (Previous
versions of OpenOffice.org socked comments away behind small yellow
marker images that I always found too troublesome to use.)
With Version 3.1, Writer's comments feature now supports conversations among document editors.
I opened a document in Word 2007, inserted a comment, saved the
document and opened it in Writer 3.1. My comment appeared in the
document's margin, and I was able to right-click it and choose reply
from a short menu. Writer created a new comment below the original
comment, which included the date and time of the original comment along
with my Word 2007 user name. I could continue the conversation from
Word by adding new comments, but Word lacks the reply shortcut.
Users of OpenOffice.org 3.1 in networked office environments will
benefit from the suite's bolstered file locking, which now does a
better job preventing overwriting of documents stored on networked
shares and accessed by users running different operating systems and
applications.
I found that separate Windows XP instances running OpenOffice.org
3.0 seemed to handle file locking well enough, giving me the option to
open a read-only version of the file or to make a copy. But
OpenOffice.org 3.0 would happily open a document that was already open
in Office 2007. With Version 3.1, file locking worked properly for me
between OpenOffice.org and Office 2007, whether both applications ran
atop Windows XP or OpenOffice.org ran from a Linux machine.
eWEEK Labs Executive Editor Jason Brooks can be reached at jbrooks@eweek.com.
| | Reader Comments: OpenOffice.org 3.1 Provides Feature, Performance Boost | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | AbiWordOk, so that comment was made ten years ago, but I still think it holds sway. Posted At: 10-26-09 By: Justin Goldberg | | | | | | AbiWordIf you want a drop-in replacement for Word get AbiWord. It is a very high quality word processor. Microsoft's Paul Maritz (now with VMWare) even... Posted At: 10-26-09 By: Justin Goldberg | | | | | | Count needs to be liveAs a professional writer too, the word count in the menu bar and toolbar are not really the answer. Those of us regularly working towards a target... Posted At: 09-29-09 By: Lewis | | | | | | file lockingup until version 3.0, OOo relied upon the system to do file locking (a file server is able to lock down a file upon request from one client). Thing... Posted At: 07-05-09 By: Mitch 74 | | | | | | None whatsoever: it is already there.Access files, or 'databases', are a closed, proprietary, protected format; OOo Base can either store its data inside an ODF-inspired database file (a... Posted At: 06-27-09 By: Mitch 74 | | | | | | not this timeThe file format used in Office 2007 is NOT standard: if you try to open an XML ISO29500:2008 document with Office 2007, you'll get a blank page (ISO... Posted At: 06-19-09 By: Mitch 74 | | | | | | Open Office Database FeaturesI have read a number of Open Office reviews over time and it appears that no-one is using the database utility, Base.
I make this assumption since... Posted At: 06-01-09 By: Vernon Funkhouser | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |