The Grounds for an Appeal
Email
Print
The entire document is stored as XML,
regardless of whether there's a feature allowing the users of Word to add
further XML into a document. And
the entire document must be read in by Word and parsed, possibly
resulting in the creation of a metacode data structure. So why did the judge
and jury focus on this rather superficial aspect?
Did they even understand that the underlying .docx format is a .zip file
with all the text encoded in XML,
and that the portion of Word where users can add on their own
"custom" XML is pretty
irrelevant to separating out the content from the formatting?
Did they understand that there's an underlying file format that looks quite
different from the document as rendered on the screen? I can't say, but it does
make me question whether the jury and judge truly understood the technology;
it's almost as if they misunderstood the "custom XML" feature of Word and its XML Structure pane, and thought that
that was somehow related to formatting the text in Word. If that's the case,
then the jury was clearly misinformed.
But one interesting aspect in the memorandum is that it describes how there
was a good bit of debate between the two sides on whether or not Word creates a
data structure internally that effectively performs the same work as the
metacode map technique described in the patent. The judge, writing in the
memorandum, makes it clear that he feels that if the data structure ultimately
performs the same task, then the software is in violation due to what he calls
the "doctrine of equivalents."
So, does Word create such a structure? Without looking at the source code,
there's no way to know. We
could guess; we could say it would make sense to create such a structure, but
without looking at the actual source code, we cannot know and are only
speculating.
If it does create one, then perhaps Word is in violation of the patent-not
just the custom XML aspect of Word,
but the entire product. But if not, if there's no such separation between the
formatting and the text, then Word probably isn't in violation-even with the
custom XML feature being present.
But one thing seems clear to me: The custom XML feature is quite irrelevant to the case. Microsoft says it
will appeal. An appeal could either hurt or help the company. On appeal, a
court may determine that the custom XML
aspect is irrelevant as I've claimed here.
Then they could either claim the entire product is in violation (not
just the XML Structure pane, which
could be removed from future versions), or they could claim the product is not
at all in violation. As such, Microsoft has some huge decisions to make on how
to move forward, as its entire Word product could be at risk.
