Readers Respond: Our View: SarbOx Is Worth Saving

 
 
By eweek  |  Posted 2006-10-31 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Readers respond to the eWEEK editorial, "SarbOx Is Worth Saving."

I agree with the basic premise of your Oct. 9 editorial that [the Sarbanes-Oxley Act] has forced companies to re-examine their procedures and associated control structures [ "Our View: SarbOx Is Worth Saving,"or "Fix, Dont Dump, SarbOx"].

The benefits that we gained from the review and implementation of COBIT [Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology]-based IT procedures and controls was vastly outweighed by the cost and amount of support we had to provide to external auditors and to our own audit firm.

Hard dollars spent on compliance hide a much bigger investment in effort by scarce and key internal IT resources to teach outsiders how we conduct our business and to satisfy audit firms demands for compliance with "one size fits all" audit programs.

Albert J. Bolet
EMS Technologies

Efficiency is error detection and avoidance. You do not get credit for correcting errors you make but for avoiding errors and the resulting economic consequences. When these consequences are discovered, they must be documented in standardized format to prevent future failures.

Jim Cummings
Data-Centric Coding Approach

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date
Rocket Fuel