PeopleSoft legal maneuvers
Barring any lengthy appeal process, PeopleSoft is now left to its own devices in fending off the buyout. Its legal defenses are formidable and include a poison pill that would flood the market with extra PeopleSoft shares if Oracle succeeds in acquiring a certain portion of the companys stock. PeopleSoft also instituted a program promising to repay customers between two and five times their license fees if Oracle ends technical support for the products within a specific period. PeopleSoft is also suing to block Oracles $7.7 billion stock tender offer on the grounds that it is damaging PeopleSofts business. The European Commission is also due to rule on whether the proposed buyout would violate its regulations on business competition.This unending legal battle of attrition tends to favor Oracle rather than PeopleSoft. Its possible that the legal maneuvering could continue for yet another year without shareholders ever getting a chance to vote on whether they want to sell the company to Oracle. That suits Oracle perfectly. The longer it can keep PeopleSoft off-balance and on the defensive, the more time Oracle has to improve its own competitive position while wearing down its rivals resistance. To read more about why the legal maneuvering between Oracle and PeopleSoft promises to continue indefinitely, click here. The time may eventually come where PeopleSoft finds that the cost of continuing the fight, in terms of business disruption and management distraction, is no longer worth it. PeopleSoft will be forced into Oracles arms if it finds that it is losing customers and market share while the legal battles continue. By early August, PeopleSoft reported that it had spent more than $70 million in its effort to fend off the Oracle buyout. In July, the company reported that it missed lowered revenue targets, with management stating that the uncertainty of the buyout battle was a factor in sales talks with customers. If this trend continues, in subsequent quarterly reports PeopleSoft may find it will be increasingly difficult to resist the buyout. PeopleSofts June 2003 buyout of J.D. Edwards was supposed to give PeopleSoft the customer base and technology assets to remain independent in a market that was ripe for consolidation. Oracles own ERP applications were far from dominant in the marketplace. The company remains a database company with its applications as just the frosting on the cake. The long-term viability of Oracles applications business was threatened by vigorous competition from SAP and the PeopleSoft-JD Edwards combination. Oracle is in a position of having to pull off the PeopleSoft buyout or sit by to watch its own sales growth stagnate as the database market continues to mature. PeopleSoft believes that if it can eventually fend off the buyout, it will have consolidated its position as the top U.S. ERP software producer, keeping Oracle in a tertiary position behind PeopleSoft and SAP. Thats why no one should expect to see PeopleSofts management waving the white flag any time soon. But this battle could prove to be so bruising to both companies that in the end they will only succeed in improving the competitive position of SAP, and perhaps even that of Microsoft, rather than their own. eWEEK.com Enterprise Applications Center Editor John Pallatto is a veteran journalist in the field of enterprise software and Internet technology. Check out eWEEK.coms Enterprise Applications Center at http://enterpriseapps.eweek.com for the latest news, reviews and analysis about productivity and business solutions.
But European regulators tend to closely monitor U.S. court decisions. The trial findings could decisively influence the European Commission to approve the Oracle buyout. Furthermore, European regulators could take the view that the PeopleSoft buyout would hardly be harmful in a European ERP software market where where Germany-based SAP is the leading player.