Google Denies Selling Out Network Neutrality with Verizon - Google Says It Is Compromising Not Selling Out (
Page 2 of 2 )
Google disagreed and Google CEO Eric Schmidt on the August 9 media call with reporters
was adamant that it would watch Verizon closely to ensure it follows
through on its promise not to discriminate.
Whitt said that under the policy a broadband provider such as
Verizon must comply with the consumer protection and nondiscrimination
standards before it could offer such online services as gaming or 3D channels.
Moreover, the FCC would monitor any such services and "intervene where
necessary."
The MDC also decried the suggestion that the FCC only be
permitted to have case-by-case adjudication "with Commission deference to
third party dispute resolution procedures as the preferred method for resolving
potential ISP abuses."
In its defense, Google argued that its proposal is a good
thing, giving the FCC the power to preserve the open Internet through
enforceable rules on broadband providers. "At the same time, the FCC would
be prohibited from imposing regulations on the Internet itself."
Ultimately, to the allegation that it has sold out, Whitt
pointed to Google's track record of fighting for network neutrality.
However, he argued that political realities have made the broadband
policy impossible to
agree on in Washington.
Hence, the compromise with Verizon, which until this year
has been one of its staunchest opponents of network neutrality as the FCC
defined it.
"At this time there are no enforceable protections –
at the Federal Communications Commission or anywhere else – against even the
worst forms of carrier discrimination against Internet traffic," Whitt
wrote.
"With that in mind, we decided to partner with a
major broadband provider on the best policy solution we could devise together."
Call it compromise or sell out, this issue has caused great consternation among not only consumer rights advocates and citizens, some of whom
held a protest August 13 at Google's Mountain View, Calif.,
headquarters, but among Internet
companies such as Facebook.
The leading social network made it clear in a statement
to eWEEK that it wants network neutrality for both wireline and wireless
networks":
"Facebook continues to support principles of net
neutrality for both landline and wireless networks. Preserving an open Internet
that is accessible to innovators -- regardless of their size or wealth -- will
promote a vibrant and competitive marketplace where consumers have ultimate
control over the content and services delivered through their Internet
connections."
Even
venture capitalists, who are not known for throwing their hats into the political
ring, are arguing that the Google-Verizon proposal impinges the ability for
their startups to flourish under the threat of discrimination versus wireless services.