Getting people out of their cubicles was awkward at first, but eventually, morale began to soar. "Id send people out to have face-to-face conversations with the people in each business unit that controlled IT spending, and for the first time in some cases, we began to understand not simply more about the oil business, but also learn details about what the units needed and were thinking about in terms of future technology," Clementz says. To help speed the process along, he created company-wide Business and IT Forums, held twice a year, to assemble all 150 to 200 key IT and business leaders in one place to share their problems and jointly hammer out solutions.
Yet as with earlier efforts, Clementz once again met resistance. During one of the early Business and IT Forums, for example, there was a heated argument between Chevrons international managers and domestic groups over how much they were getting charged by CITC for network services. But Clementz persisted, determined to create solutions based on alignment strategy as much as on technology. At early meetings, he recalls, "wed group people at tables by their regions, or business interests." Each person would be given two paper folders, one red and one green. "Wed put a proposal out there for a technology change, or ask the whole assembled group if they liked something we were doing," Clementz says, "and then just sit back and see what color cards came up."
When questions arose, for example, over whether Chevron was going to charge its employees in Nigeria for using the global network, people seated at the international tables began waving their red folders in earnest, forcing Clementz to stop the meeting and call on those assembled for a joint solution. "We didnt solve it that second," Clementz says, "but by the next morning, the network guys had figured out a formula they could use to give relief to the international people." Sure it would mean rates for domestic people would go up, Clementz remembers, but by the time the forum ended, however, the problem got solved: people who used the network the most, regardless of location, would need to pay the most for it. The decision set a new precedent for collective problem-solving within IT, and set the stage for a new, less hierarchical culture at the firm. Says Clementz: "Its an example of how a financial decision to break down the costs of everything leads to greater communication and then greater accountability, and then greater teamwork."
Still, even Clementzs own staff was less than thrilled, at first, about the move to activity-based cost-accounting. Besides demanding higher levels of communication and time-consuming consensus-building, it also would require extra work to perform the detailed cost analyses required by the new system. "Making these costs transparent was critical to getting the kind of alignment we needed," Clementz says, so he hired 10 more accountants to handle the extra load. Eventually, though, the savings reaped by the new system more than paid for the extra head count.
Knowing more led to surprises all around. While the new accounting system enabled more precise spending decisionsClementz was able to impose a new rule that IT had to recover to within 97 percent to 103 percent of its budget on projectsit also meant that if IT under-charged or overcharged business units for IT services, there could be an uproar. "When we first did the activity-based accounting, I discovered we were over-recovering about $30 million a year on the mainframes," Clementz recalls, "and about $10 million of that was being charged to the marketing department." So Clementz started handing out rebates to correct the errorsand to continue his drive to bolster his departments credibility. It worked. "I went to the marketing VP and said, Look, Ive just done an analysis of the costs, and youve been overcharged for your mainframe, so were going to reduce your mainframe charges by $10 million next year. He looked at me like he wanted to kiss me." Rather than take the rebate and spend it on marketing, he decided to invest it in a new IT program.
Still, Clementz knew that if he were to make any long-term progress boosting credibility, his department also would have to rate itself on performance, and give business-side staff a chance to rate them, too. "We even ding ourselves if we fail to measure up to our metrics," Clementz says, "and I know thats not the norm for IT departments."
ChevronTexaco continues to hold annual IT performance reviews that dock bonus pay if IT fails to recover cost within 3 percent of budget. Business-side managers also rate CITC on performance metrics, including network reliability, the number of service outages, how well service level agreements are fulfilled and how close IT projects come to being on time and on budget.
Sound brutal? It was: Most people employed under the old system ended up quitting or getting fired. And while the overall IT workforce shrank by 25 percent, the turnover in CITC upper management was even higher. Of the original senior management team that Clementz inherited in 1997, none remain. The next-level management team is mostly new now, toowith perhaps only about 15 percent Chevron veterans who, Clementz says, understood the importance of making IT responsive and fully accountable to business. "Theres an old saying we use at this company a lot when youre going through a massive cultural change: You either change the people, or you change the people," Clementz quips. "You change whats between their ears, or you change them out, and thats what you have to do if you want to drive change and drive it in a hurry."
This July, Clementz, 58, retired from ChevronTexaco and opened a consulting firm. The CITC staff has kept the structure Clementz and his team created. His IT and business forums and meetings with customers have been institutionalized and help to keep business and IT budget goals more closely aligned. An open-book policy means that any CITC customer can see what they were charged and why.
And time sheets are being kept now too, if not quite perfectly, then well enough. Says Clementz: "Do people fill them out religiously? No, they probably fudge. They get close to a deadline and customers are beating on them about costs, and they probably dont account for all their hours. But I tell you its a hell of a lot better than it used to be. Were a lot closer, maybe within 10 percent of the truth versus, well, you didnt even know . . ."
Next Page: Measure for measure: Rating IT by productivity, incidents and financial performance.