Nations that have exceeded the United States in a number of broadband metrics embraced a policy of open access for competitors to traditional carriers. Open access was originally a policy objective of the 1996 Telecommunications Act but the FCC abandoned the idea when the United States began transitioning from dial-up to broadband.Industrialized
nations that rank above the United States in broadband in a variety of
metrics implemented open access policies -- unbundling,
bitstream access, collocation requirements, wholesaling, and/or
functional separation -- to achieve their success, according to a study
commissioned by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and conducted by Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society.
The
study is part of the FCC's task force's work preparing the National
Broadband Plan ordered by Congress for February delivery.
"The lowest prices and highest speeds are almost all offered by firms in markets where, in
addition
to an incumbent telephone company and a cable company, there are also
competitors who entered the market, and built their presence, through
use of open access facilities," the report states.
The report
adds that open access policies "are almost universally understood as
having played a core role in the first generation transition to
broadband in most of the high performing countries; that they now play
a core role in planning for the next generation transition; and that
the positive impact of such policies is strongly supported by the
evidence of the first generation
broadband transition."
Imposing
open access policies on broadband carriers stands in stark contrast to
current U.S. policy. Although the Telecommunications Act of 1996
imposed a number of open access requirements on carriers, including
forcing the original Baby Bells to share their copper lines with
competitors, the FCC abandoned those policies almost a decade ago.
In
2002, the FCC ruled that cable
broadband providers are information services and do not have to share
their
lines with competing ISPs (Internet service providers). The ruling
prompted a Santa Monica, Calif.-based ISP named Brand X to sue
the FCC for open access to cable lines.
The case eventually went to the
Supreme Court, which last summer ruled the FCC was within its
regulatory authority to exempt cable modems from common carrier
obligations.
The FCC then extended the same exemption from
common carrier regulations to telephone companies offering broadband
service. The two FCC rulings had the practical effect of doing away with the slew of
regulations mandating open access that came out of the 1996
Telecommunications Act.
"Open access policies seek to make it easier for new
competitors to enter and compete in broadband markets by requiring
existing carriers to lease access to their networks to their
competitors, mostly at regulated rates," the report states. "The idea
is that the cost of replicating the underlying physical plant: digging
trenches, laying ducts, pulling copper/cable/fiber to each and every
home is enormous; it therefore deters competitors from entering the
market in broadband services."
By requiring broadband capacity
to be shared with competitors, open access rules are intended to
encourage entry by those competitors, who can then focus their own
investments and innovation on electronics and services that use that
basic infrastructure.
The FCC is seeking public comment on the study and has posted the draft for public review at
http://www.fcc.gov/stage/pdf/Berkman_Center_Broadband_Study_13Oct09.pdf.