Microsoft Seeks Remedy Hearing Delay

 
 
By Peter Galli  |  Posted 2002-03-05 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Microsoft asked the courts for a delay in a hearing on the antitrust case of nine states and the District of Columbia because it says those plaintiffs changed their settlement offer in proposed final settlement agreement between the software maker and the Department of Justice. In an emergency motion filed with the U.S. District Court in Washington, Microsoft asked for a delay in the remedies hearing until March 25 to "enable Microsoft to take limited discovery on the non-settling States substantially revised proposed remedy , filed with the Court yesterday afternoon—only one week before the remedies hearing is scheduled to begin and without any notice to Microsoft or the Court." The remedy hearing is scheduled to begin next Monday. Microsoft and the litigating states will each get about 100 hours to present their witnesses, a process that could take weeks.
Yesterday, the litigating states filed an amended version of their remedy proposals in which they said Microsoft should be forced to offer a modular version of its Windows operating system in addition to the fully integrated version of the product.
The states described the changes as "largely minor", with Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller saying the revisions clarified "the reasonable and responsible remedies we are seeking in our continuing effort to stop Microsofts illegal behavior. "The proposal is entirely consistent with the objectives of our original remedy proposal, and the proposed changes are only minor modifications to make our remedy more clear and precise," he said. While the parties had discussed the emergency motion filed Tuesday, the non-settling States opposed the motion, Microsoft said in the filing, adding that "on the eve of trial, the non-settling States have filed an extensively-revised proposed remedy, in a last minute effort to paper over some of the more glaring defects in their original relief proposal that have been revealed during discovery."
Unless Microsoft, of Redmond, Wash., was allowed to conduct limited additional discovery, the company would go to trial without having an opportunity to depose the non-settling States witnesses about their understanding of the meaning of the substantially-revised proposed remedy and its likely impact on consumers, the PC industry and Microsoft, the filing said. "Microsoft thus will be severely prejudiced by the non-settling States eleventh-hour revisions to their proposed remedy," the filing said. "The non-settling States timed the submission of their revised remedy proposal to inflict maximum prejudice on Microsoft. "They waited until after the deadline had passed for serving document requests and interrogatories. They waited until after Microsoft had deposed all of their expert witnesses and all but one of their fact witnesses. They waited until after they had deposed nearly all of Microsofts witnesses. They waited until after their third-party witnesses had completed their document productions and Microsoft had identified all of its witnesses and trial exhibits. "And they waited until after Microsoft had filed all of its motions in limine and the parties had submitted their joint pretrial statement. In fact, but for the Courts decision last Friday to postpone the final pretrial conference, the non-settling States would have waited until the very day of the final pretrial conference to reveal their revised proposed remedy," Microsoft said. Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler on Tuesday justified the call for a delay, saying the non-settling States had made substantial revisions – revising 11 of 16 sections of their proposed judgment – just one week before hearings were scheduled to begin. Having spent the past month in an extensive period of discovery focused on the States original proposals, Microsoft was seeking "limited time to depose select witnesses about the meaning of the extensively revised proposed remedy, and its potential impacts on industry and consumers," Desler said. "The States extensive, last-minute changes require a limited and reasonable postponement. This time will be used for the limited purposes of quickly conducting additional discovery so we have an opportunity to present a case that addresses the adverse affects of these new proposals on the industry and on consumers," he added.

 
 
 
 
Peter Galli has been a financial/technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has been Investment Editor of South Africa's Business Day Newspaper, the sister publication of the Financial Times of London.

He was also Group Financial Communications Manager for First National Bank, the second largest banking group in South Africa before moving on to become Executive News Editor of Business Report, the largest daily financial newspaper in South Africa, owned by the global Independent Newspapers group.

He was responsible for a national reporting team of 20 based in four bureaus. He also edited and contributed to its weekly technology page, and launched a financial and technology radio service supplying daily news bulletins to the national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, which were then distributed to some 50 radio stations across the country.

He was then transferred to San Francisco as Business Report's U.S. Correspondent to cover Silicon Valley, trade and finance between the US, Europe and emerging markets like South Africa. After serving that role for more than two years, he joined eWeek as a Senior Editor, covering software platforms in August 2000.

He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise.

He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.

His interviews with senior industry executives include Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Linus Torvalds, the original developer of the Linux operating system, Sun CEO Scot McNealy, and Bill Zeitler, a senior vice president at IBM.

For numerous examples of his writing you can search under his name at the eWEEK Website at www.eweek.com.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel