The RFID-alternative is helping to locate patients down to a specific room, which is something RFID can't do.
When Brigham and Womens Hospital in Boston needed to find a better way to track emergency room patients, they wanted to use RFID. But they ran into a wall. Literally.
It seems that the radio frequency approach was able to triangulate the position of patients by distance, but not by room. It wouldnt recognize walls so it couldnt identify rooms.
Working with a grant from the National Library of Medicine, hospital officials started experimenting with a technology their maternity wards were already quite familiar with: ultrasound.
A modified version of the same technology that lets first-trimester parents see their yet-to-be-born baby is being used to address the hospitals need for a patient-tracking system.
That need was initially envisioned for catastrophic situationsa Katrina-level natural disaster or a 9/11-level terrorist attackwhere a hospital would quickly get flooded with patients on little notice.
As patients are moved from waiting rooms to various triage centers to makeshift patient rooms and operating rooms, its easy for a hectic hospital to lose track of some.
But Dr. Tom Stair, an attending physician in Brigham and Womens emergency department and one of the physicians in charge of the patient-tracking project (called SMART, standing for Scalable Medical Alert and Response Technology), quickly concluded that such capabilities need not be limited to large-scale disasters.
"This happens on a smaller scale almost every afternoon," he said, pointing out that the hospitals emergency room has space for 44 patients. "Almost every single day, we go beyond that and start losing medical records and losing track of patients."
For practical business issues, giving the emergency room more space is not a likely option. The emergency room "doesnt generate that much money for the hospital, so they dont want us to grow that much," Stair said.
The need for creative approaches for tracking patients quickly is exacerbated by the realities of 21st century hospital management.
"The surge capacity that used to be here [in Boston] is gone," Stair said. "There used to be lots of empty hospital beds sitting around" but hospital closings have changed much of that.
"In the interest of economy, we have made it all go away."
Indeed, for potential emergencies, Stairs team has been looking at those closed hospitals as emergency overflow locations.
The hospitals experimental system consists of a small fannypack with a Hewlett-Packard iPAQ handheld running Linux. Four cables come out of the pack and are attached to the patient: three are glued to the patients chest and one is clipped to the finger.
Will hospitals truly move ahead with electronic medical records this year? To find out, click here.
This allows the hospital to both monitor the patients exact locationusing a tracking device that Stair describes as looking like "a fat ballpoint pen"as well as watch some vital signs, specifically cardiac rhythm and oxygen saturation.
The systems intent is to start tracking patient location and condition immediately at the site of the emergency and continue ambulance transportation, triage and movement through multiple medical sites and eventually between rooms at the final facility.
SMART, which is a collaboration between Brigham, the neighboring Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, coordinates all of that data and shares it across an 802.11b wireless network to the network server.
Other iPAQs are used by hospital staff to monitor the results from the patient devices. "The PDA screen for the caregivers, it looks like a spreadsheet" and allows personnel to zoom in on any patient.
When medical readings go beyond set limits, "it shows a color change and the thing will buzz and vibrate," Stair said. "When somebody develops an abnormal heart rhythm, theres going to be an alarm."
Next Page: Ultrasound versus RFID.