A Post-War Network

 
 
By Carmen Nobel  |  Posted 2003-04-07 Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Lawmaker wants CDMA rather than GSM in Iraq.

A California lawmaker wants to make sure American technology is used in the wake of an American victory in Iraq, but his effort to control cellular technology in the Middle East nation is being called ill-advised and self-serving by critics.

Late last month, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., proposed a bill to Congress, H.R. 1441, that would require the use of CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) technology in lieu of GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology for any federally funded efforts to build a cell phone network in post-war Iraq.

In a letter to government officials, including the Department of Defense, Issa argued that GSM is not American enough and, furthermore, too French. He boosted his point by referring to the technology as "Groupe Speciale Mobile," its original but dated name.

"We have learned that planners at the Department of Defense ... are currently envisioning using federal appropriations to deploy a European-based wireless technology known as GSM (Groupe Speciale Mobile)," Issa wrote. "If European GSM technology is deployed in Iraq, much of the equipment used to build the cell phone system would be manufactured in France, Germany, and elsewhere."

H.R. 1441 has only one sponsor.

Qualcomm Inc., located in Issas hometown of San Diego, owns the majority of the patents for CDMA and therefore receives the majority of royalties for CDMA deployments. Qualcomm is not in Issas district, but the company gave $5,500 to the congressmans last political campaign.

"What would you expect the representative from that area to do?" said Ken Dulaney, an analyst at Gartner Inc., in San Jose, Calif. "They probably dropped a few bucks in his kitty for doing this."

Qualcomm declined to comment on the proposed legislation, referring questions to Issas office. Issas office did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

GSM, on the other hand, shares patents among several companies in several countries. The technology was born in Europe. In the early 1980s, Scandinavian and Dutch operators proposed a pan-European public cellular system in the 900MHz range, which would allow for seamless roaming and prevent a cellular Tower of Babel in Europe. Meanwhile, the United States was deploying myriad wireless networks, a reason, industry experts say, why Europe tends to be ahead of the United States in wireless innovation.

"GSM was misrepresented in [Issas] letter," said Chris Pearson, executive vice president of 3G Americas LLC, a Bellevue, Wash., consortium of vendors and network operators focused on global convergence of wireless networks. "[GSM] is global in nature and should not be considered a European technology."



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel