Modernization Is Mandatory

 
 
By Chris Preimesberger  |  Posted 2008-09-24 Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


The way the FAA has its flight-plan system set up, there simply is no bandwidth for testing a newer system.

"The FAA, with our lives and livelihood in their hands, should be a LOT more proactive in addressing modernization needs before it becomes a crisis with a scope and complexity that defies resolution," server admin Milne wrote to eWEEK.

"This kind of thing [system crashes] happens when changes are pushed into production without adequate testing. It's ironic that the system being criticized is (even after 20 years) the state of the art for functionality worldwide, because the infrastructure that was once redundant now has both platforms fully tasked-much less having resources for a test system," Milne wrote.

The way to port a legacy application is to build an exact replica on a current platform, forgoing the temptation to implement upgrades of any kind. But the age of the system and other limitations do not allow for adequate testing.

"Anything else is unable to function demonstrably in a parallel operations validation scenario that's necessary to establish sufficient confidence to warrant cut-over," Milne wrote.

"Until the FAA bites the bullet and accepts this restriction, we are subject to similar outages while they get their NextGen architecture stood up and functioning. But considering the cost and the limited disruption up to now, it may be worth accepting the pain for a time. If that's what they want to do, the right thing is to establish a deadline, after which they are obliged to stop and update the legacy application as the price of gaining the time to perfect the new system," Milne wrote.

"My interest is based on being a consumer of the FAA's services-a little over 2 million miles flown so far. I am shocked, no, I'm way beyond shocked at how antiquated the equipment is (where does someone go to get replacement vacuum tubes?). Sure, it works well most of the time (thank God). But we have better technology on golf carts, it seems."



 
 
 
 
Chris Preimesberger Chris Preimesberger was named Editor-in-Chief of Features & Analysis at eWEEK in November 2011. Previously he served eWEEK as Senior Writer, covering a range of IT sectors that include data center systems, cloud computing, storage, virtualization, green IT, e-discovery and IT governance. His blog, Storage Station, is considered a go-to information source. Chris won a national Folio Award for magazine writing in November 2011 for a cover story on Salesforce.com and CEO-founder Marc Benioff, and he has served as a judge for the SIIA Codie Awards since 2005. In previous IT journalism, Chris was a founding editor of both IT Manager's Journal and DevX.com and was managing editor of Software Development magazine. His diverse resume also includes: sportswriter for the Los Angeles Daily News, covering NCAA and NBA basketball, television critic for the Palo Alto Times Tribune, and Sports Information Director at Stanford University. He has served as a correspondent for The Associated Press, covering Stanford and NCAA tournament basketball, since 1983. He has covered a number of major events, including the 1984 Democratic National Convention, a Presidential press conference at the White House in 1993, the Emmy Awards (three times), two Rose Bowls, the Fiesta Bowl, several NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments, a Formula One Grand Prix auto race, a heavyweight boxing championship bout (Ali vs. Spinks, 1978), and the 1985 Super Bowl. A 1975 graduate of Pepperdine University in Malibu, Calif., Chris has won more than a dozen regional and national awards for his work. He and his wife, Rebecca, have four children and reside in Redwood City, Calif.Follow on Twitter: editingwhiz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel