Science Is Hard, Budget Cutting Is Easy

 
 
By Wayne Rash  |  Posted 2011-07-09 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

I listened when Alan Shepherd took the first 15-minute ride on top of a converted ballistic missile. I listened on the radio when fellow Mercury program Astronaut Scott Carpenter bid "Godspeed John Glenn," as the former Marine test pilot lifted off to become the first American to reach earth orbit. I watched the first ghostly images from the moon, and the first shuttle launch.

In those days Americans believed that there was nothing that we couldn't do when it came to science and engineering. We were willing to take on the tough jobs because those were the jobs worth doing. Now, it appears, no job is worth doing if it's difficult or if it doesn't lead directly to re-election of some member of Congress somewhere. But failing that, the ax falls first on those things that are hard, or at least hard to understand.

The final flight of Atlantis is taking place not because Atlantis has outlived her useful life, but because Congress doesn't understand why science and research is important. They also don't particularly care if those thousands of scientists and engineers who make spaceflight possible lose their jobs, as long as too many of them aren't in their districts. This is why, on a day when we see the U.S. walk away from manned spaceflight, we also see the Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives zero out the funding for the James Webb Space Telescope-the successor to the legendary Hubble Space Telescope. Yes, the Webb telescope is over budget, but what government project isn't?

The real reason that the Webb Space Telescope is being killed is the same reason that the shuttle program is being killed-Congress, the people you elected to represent you in Washington-is more interested in telling you how they did the tough task of cutting spending on projects that no longer have any political payback for themselves or their political ambitions. They would rather write off our future than risk losing an election.

Winning elections, it seems, is more important than science. Our congressional representatives want the quick answer, the glib sound bite, the quick 'n' dirty fix. It does not want to do the hard work of keeping the U.S. competitive.

In other words, winning elections is all that counts. This is why Americans who love the space program are no longer heard in Congress. This is why we've walked away from all of the advances in science and technology over the years. This is why we've killed the shuttle.

When Atlantis touches down on July 20 to become a tourist attraction, the mortgaging of our future will be complete. U.S. manned spaceflight will become part of history. Our legacy now lies with a dozen other countries that will continue with manned space exploration because they have figured out that you can't move into the future if you refuse to do those things that are hard. 




 
 
 
 
Wayne Rash Wayne Rash is a Senior Analyst for eWEEK Labs and runs the magazineÔÇÖs Washington Bureau. Prior to joining eWEEK as a Senior Writer on wireless technology, he was a Senior Contributing Editor and previously a Senior Analyst in the InfoWorld Test Center. He was also a reviewer for Federal Computer Week and Information Security Magazine. Previously, he ran the reviews and events departments at CMP's InternetWeek.

He is a retired naval officer, a former principal at American Management Systems and a long-time columnist for Byte Magazine. He is a regular contributor to Plane & Pilot Magazine and The Washington Post.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel