|
|
|

HP, Dell Respond to Cisco's Data Center Ambitions
By: Chris Preimesberger
2009-03-23
Article Rating:    / 5
There are 2 user comments on this IT Infrastructure story.
HP, Dell Respond to Cisco's Data Center Ambitions (
Page 1 of 2 ) Data center systems competitors claim Cisco's network-centric view of the data center is great for bandwidth management, but falls short in the areas of service-level delivery and data reliability and accessibility. Vendor lock-in is another issue, HP says.What do Cisco Systems' key competitors in the data center systems business
really think of the big networking fish that will soon be flopping around in
their pond, trying to gain new market share?
Cisco
announced on March 16 its Unified Computing System strategy, which includes
the production of new network-centric server, software and services that will
compete directly with those of Hewlett-Packard, Dell and other systems makers.
All IT vendor roads lead to the data center, and the paths that go there often
cross over each other. Business is done on a slippery slope when companies that
partner on some technology solutions have to become cutthroat competitors in
other sectors; you can't talk too nastily about a partnering company without
burning some bridges that could have been useful later on.
However, Hewlett-Packard, which has been in the IT systems business for three
generations, was pretty candid about this new challenge.
"Would you let a plumber build your house?" Jim Ganthier, HP's vice
president of infrastructure software and blades, asked eWEEK. "Cisco's
network-centric view of the data center is great for bandwidth management, but
leaves a lot to chance in terms of service-level delivery as well as data
reliability and accessibility."
HP: Been there, done that?
Ganthier said he heard the March 16 Cisco presentation introducing the new
initiative, which brings in a number of partners (such as EMC,
Microsoft, VMware, BMC and Accenture) to handle
various parts of the UCS solutions. Cisco is providing the network
infrastructureplus a new network-centric server called the B-Class and some
associated servicesto sell to enterprises that are planning to refurbish their
aging data centers.
"We thought, 'Nice event, but we're delivering today what they promise
tomorrow,'" Ganthier told eWEEK.
"Most people I know are saying, 'HP stepping into an adjacency area such
as networkingwhich we've done successfully with both ProCurve and
VirtualConnectwell, that seems rather doable,' " Ganthier said. "But
Cisco stepping into an adjacent area, such as storage or servers, and not
addressing any of the other value chain or life-cycle aspects? That's a little
bit harder to basically do the leap of faith on."
Cisco's new UCS strategy also appears to be a lock-in for Cisco and its
partners, Ganthier said.
"The way that Cisco portrayed this thing, it's one server, one OS, one
management piece, one chunk of storage," Ganthier said. "Remember the
movie '2001: A Space Odyssey'? It reminded me of the big 1 by 4 by 9
monolithic block. That is, that everything is predefined, prebuilt for you.
What if somebody wants to take a different hypervisor? Or a different
management construct? Cisco has already pretty much pre-chosen a lot of the
components for you. Our belief is that you should have a choice."
|
|
x}v㶒s{̎Sj^-c[ޖ9t(S$7IVg2S7]hɗNgݫm
@P(
o^ȹ=&>:74ϸ3{?O@BFNtk]UHѻzZn4/o
kGx)oފx&/hoTa@Y21$h(ͷtL|OkEs
_Ķ^alM
Lh:qF٨XCPjT/VKtP"{֝{2كS4gVko~w.UdEe*Gn0Tp;\ru=[qؼam a B'ߊFb}"@DeR)$^&64t<_MB^$9@JI?|%rP:(*RWK%j̮gF,, uGҾ췯;6鷏ώ;S$oIJ1<jUQ*HJzb!=ޙ7'7ϗ7˓MvIcCR5TY 09;BV>;$OOWm2 Շ1 xS<œ qN {(-TKۗ9K2}xc-> ,G!H,聞U|`nmdʰ(|Krn9];L~cE#䃃V7ib:
)BdT_3;j\}0쭑Ca)"8?ՃIpj aCGӪs6,Źw%,|YB*sJnPWȨYSNeIJ7EDqr4=.|YqI(G){?NIR^E6\lf>UKg<8z6wܬ.U$ԴXߙ-~ӒKsqnUŧvz߆)eF8,H.e$8WG9UGZ9UݣEʐTt K"& `J_T
[ö@.1RgVPP},|P4;ujx?SߧnΦjۉ!9*ڠN+/qKTmb>'ݨpV83
U(z13a
>
>FN9 =H*}n9A%UǶCMߟLG`p&;hk
-D+wcE#` V}R+?m:fQ(9N@4u mMrA=S9jZд@ţ@ |