IBM is pressing what it sees as an advantage over HP and Sun by cutting prices by as much as 70 percent on memory in its Power systems. The goal is to further tempt customers of Sun's SPARC systems and HP's Itanium platform to migrate to IBM's Power architecture. However, one analyst also said that the Power platform also is competing with less-expensive x86 systems, which are moving deeper into scale-up environments.
IBM officials are sharply cutting memory prices on their Power
systems in hopes of enticing more Hewlett-Packard and Sun Microsystems
customers to migrate their RISC platform.
IBM will reduce memory prices 28 to 70 percent, believing that such
a move will lure more customers onto the Power architecture, according
to Scott Handy, vice president of worldwide marketing and strategy for
IBM's Power systems platform.
The price cuts are being announced Nov. 17.
IBM is looking to press an advantage is sees over HP and Sun, which
Handy said are dealing with questions from customers about the future
of those platforms.
Those concerns have led to business for IBM, he said. In 2007 and
2008, IBM has seen about $500 million in new business for its Power
platform, about 80 percent of which has come through migrations by HP
and Sun customers, Handy said. Through the third quarter of this year,
IBM has generated $400 million in new business.
"We're poised to have a better year this year," he said.
Handy pointed to the uncertainty surrounding Sun's possible acquisition by Oracle, and the delays by Intel of its "Tukwila" next-generation Itanium
processor-which powers HP's Integrity servers-as key issues for IBM's competitors.
IBM already offers a host of financial incentives to HP and Sun
customers who migrate to Power-for example, Sun customers get $8,000
per core toward migration services, Handy said.
Memory price was an area that IBM officials identified as a way of
increasing the enticements to customers looking to jump off HP and Sun
Oracle is waiting for European regulators to OK its proposed $7.4 billion purchase of Sun. Oracle officials will argue their case
Nov. 25 to the European Commission, which has filed a formal objection to the deal in large part to concerns over MySQL.
In the meantime, Sun is losing money and customers are left to
wonder whether Oracle will follow through on promises to invest in
Sun's SPARC platform.
Intel in May delayed the release of Tukwila until early 2010, the
second time in 2009 that the chip's release was postponed. The delay
impacts HP, which is the primary user of Itanium. In addition, Intel is
getting ready to release its eight-core "Nehalem EX" Xeon processor for
systems with four or more chips. Intel has been driving up Xeon for
scale-up computing environments.
For its part, IBM has said its Power7 processor will be releases in
2010, and Handy said he is confident it will be out before Tukwila.
Gordon Haff, an analyst with Illuminata, said IBM has done well with
its Power architecture, but said there are other reasons why Big Blue
would want to lower the price of its systems beyond taking business
away from HP and Sun. IBM's Power systems also are competing with x86
servers, which are encroaching into the higher end and are cheaper than
Big Blue's RISC systems, Haff said.
"It's not untrue that what they're doing is taking on Sun and HP,
but everything they do is takes on Sun and HP," Haff said. "But it's
not the whole story."
In addition, while Sun is certainly having its problems, the Oracle
deal will most likely go through, he said. Meanwhile, Itanium is still
a solid high-end processor, and HP will continue to sell systems
powered by the chip, he said.