These are tough times. Dwelling on past mistakes does no one any good.
A strange thing is happening in the industry, and it cant be good. Billion-dollar vendors are apologizing for doing what theyre supposed to do. Rather than blame a massive downturn in technology spending on the post-Internet bubble, the year 2000 buildup of tech expenditures, corporate ethical collapses, terrorist attacks or simply plain-old business cycles, many vendors have issued a collective "Im sorry."
One of the first to apologize was Tom Siebel, who said vendors including Siebel Systems made software too complex. Then Larry Ellison said Oracle was also to blame for selling too many databases and for spending 25 years getting technology wrong. Ray Lane, the former No. 2 at Oracle, blamed the buying and selling process. Prior to this, Microsoft issued a huge apology for concentrating on features and not on security. Microsofts Trustworthy Computing initiative emerged out of that mea culpa.
Sun, meanwhile, admitted that its software strategy was confusing and that its Java messaging had been obscured. Computer Associates has said in the past that it was obscuring its technologies under incomprehensible branding strategies based around Jasmine, which at one time was simply an object database. At least one IBM official said part of the problem was that IT was sold to the wrong peoplethose with the checkbooksrather than those who knew how to integrate the technology.
These apologies are intended to show vendors shouldering some of the blame for the industries woes. Theyre also a meager attempt to ask for forgiveness so that when technology buying returns, those doing the buying will return to the apologizers. But guess what: Technology spending may never come back, and if it doesnt, its going to be in part because of these apologies. When a campaigning politician apologizes, the candidate is weakened. Its a throw-in-the-towel strategy. When a defendant expresses remorse, the sentence might be more lenient, but the guilt is still there.
Corporations need strength, vision, patience and to listen to customers. Apologies basically tell people that major computer companies are guilty, which at best exudes a loss of confidence and at worst a lack of direction. These are tough times. Dwelling on past mistakes does no one any good. Get over it. Fix whats wrong, and move on.
Would you buy from an apologetic company? Write to me at email@example.com.
As the director of eWEEK Labs, John manages a staff that tests and analyzes a wide range of corporate technology products. He has been instrumental in expanding eWEEK Labs' analyses into actual user environments, and has continually engineered the Labs for accurate portrayal of true enterprise infrastructures. John also writes eWEEK's 'Wide Angle' column, which challenges readers interested in enterprise products and strategies to reconsider old assumptions and think about existing IT problems in new ways. Prior to his tenure at eWEEK, which started in 1994, Taschek headed up the performance testing lab at PC/Computing magazine (now called Smart Business). Taschek got his start in IT in Washington D.C., holding various technical positions at the National Alliance of Business and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. There, he and his colleagues assisted the government office with integrating the Windows desktop operating system with HUD's legacy mainframe and mid-range servers.