|
|
|

Sun Calls DOJ Slowdown of Oracle Deal Simply an Irritation
By: Chris Preimesberger
2009-06-29
Article Rating:    / 3
There are 0 user comments on this IT Infrastructure story.
Sun Calls DOJ Slowdown of Oracle Deal Simply an Irritation (
Page 1 of 2 ) The federal government decides to spend more time performing due diligence on the proposed Oracle-Sun merger, perhaps 30 to 60 more days. Sun says this is not unexpected due to the size of the IT infrastructure transaction.Oracle
certainly would like to complete its acquisition
of Sun Microsystems as soon as possible, but the Department of Justice has,
in effect, told the enterprise database giant: "Not so fast."
A deadline for the Department of Justice to file an "all-clear"
affidavit passed after 30 days at the end of business on June 26. Approval would
have allowed the proposed acquisition of Sun for
$7.4 billion to proceed to the next levels of scrutiny: the Federal Trade
Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The DOJ, the highest-ranking law enforcement agency in the United States, is
empowered to study the potential abuse of antitrust law in corporate mergers
and acquisitionsespecially those involving multibillion-dollar companies such
as Oracle and Sun.
But Sun, which has been bleeding dollars for nearly 10 years in the new IT
economy and has the most to gain from the acquisition, does not appear to be
worried about federal scrutiny. In fact, the company told eWEEK this is simply
an "irritation."
"This is not unexpected," a Sun spokesperson who asked not to be
identified told eWEEK. "The new [Obama] administration is looking [more
closely] at all mergers and acquisitions, by necessity. They're looking deeply
into all aspects of the economy.
"This is too big a transaction for them to simply let go through on the first
pass."
A combined Oracle-Sun corporation would have a market capitalization of about
$115 billion. At the present time, Oracle's market cap is about $107.6 billion;
Sun's is just below $7 billion.
Experts: Plenty of separation in product lines
IT analysts and industry people contacted by eWEEK said they believe that
Oracle and Sun have sufficient separation in their product lines that a block on the
acquisition plans isn't warranted.
Oracle is the world leader in enterprise database and IT middleware tools, and produces
little or no hardware; Sun is a multifaceted IT systems company that makes
enterprise networking softwarenearly all of which, including Java, is of the
open-source varietyas well as enterprise servers, storage arrays, digital tape
storage machines, networking switches, thin-client terminals and a long list of
other hardware products.
One of the main areas of overlap, certainly, is in databases: Sun is the de
facto leadership owner of development of the open-source MySQL franchise, while
Oracle's prime-time products are its proprietary Oracle i series, Siebel and
PeopleSoft enterprise databases. With the addition of MySQL, Oracle would
own even more than its lion's shareestimated at about 75 percentof the
parallel enterprise database market.
The DOJ may well see some potential antitrust problems there, but it also
should be noted that there are plenty of other contenders that are quite
profitable in this market, led by Germany's
SAP and the open-source Ingres product.
|
|
x}r8j9;N3EۑR%ǚXRIT(8H-IVۗ?_8x-NƳ'-`h
F{{o$rhiI1%SxTwI}"IWLß2J.:AZ&!:,o )>#Yخetj+u{#|6b%;|9|@D%j'~M5czm_6ژz2ٱ9گ3fE63JG};Dm@~5[2"&Inv$Z|gvH~rDϱL-:
ۗ<+߃*Cx8ܱi/DaOI!x5E hD#|xL{͎0_y4*[U;az3K[7SѠ*v25vn@Zk#LHȾ7ԇ_
*Y>gD=DV,w2*5";1ҡc u
qarJ*JHtGsM: fKu`7slqAzOp1Iݢ'Q!ʟCbp`eF(
#O~b4:a;6]fu~ƷPoƮ3C2wߟvQwT9mCO|l
͛PxAu|ӱaKGP5#k8she7YnJXU+Q\(UsNrww3mù,ӞߛʜYVwnZ×yj.W.g(pnkW0U=퓋[yX} _`oem+1y R*G8y_4::^'v{jwjzQ[A-/Zj^ͩGj>R9,kz fV҈'EUXۭ~S~2.˫vEvlM,O!\VUZ(]?#[Szq}ڼ~n_4=rڽ"֧IٙN0psZ?y['{:$O-rK]jizTyS{|"x|>!I'7og90jg,Yn]dH&||Y|؛Y72i4(.߆A·[ 4TUt-Mf_"dL&Zp-Alo
Kh.(H)5? &`Mil&XJp;Vs&`qK0TQ0mRa:]b%aẍ^,ʹc#'^IRe6\niPY<8~tw,u"մޙ.~8BixjeOVxǫD
#KEHYf7-wI09갦騖Kt=Jj*Gx1WUrG8ʍ/;1m!S[ö@3&
:斟ռ?x`贆;mJ_OaΧf۱9z4DAC62^lzK5}b>'ݰäpV834fuӹgA {>0}sJY-VD$h-DAw
0Ixe&S@yKs LΝހ25C/FlMPjX^0{@`^@Z8pp yY?90ûDgz߽9#|[LKxKN QV\QDM2r)%dh⣋4.'@(AH 999^
Ŋ?P^MHX)VpDm'8Ν3PbH {TKh+K@f:30YIBM&힟u]_
#n"09X
?,'Z
X%j1m0*g5ߘCOzgؑrSrjҥ/yU0w` .z:H(Lq0xnv(d5UW̭NrB@͕᧔, Lj@'mdz7Ќ[Gq)28Sf8),4|tOWݡ~T?ͦzkXؽp@r6y2Kmg@yC X{+/,7(kA+_iids~ʹ,Cm6\i^%xTRS v3pl=5G&5 |