Opinion: Instead of buying more of the same in an attempt to prevent problems like the recent stock market IT glitch, consider a new approach to computing.
The day after a computer glitch resulted in a 70-minute period when no one seemed to know where the Dow Jones industrial average was headed, only to see it drop nearly 200 points in a matter of seconds once reporting was resumed, I was having a much better day than the IT folks at Dow Jones and the New York Stock Exchange.
While those poor souls were doubtlessly trying to figure out just what went wrong, I was having lunch with Bill Coleman, the co-founder of BEA Systems and founder of Cassatt.
While most of Silicon Valley seems to be enamored with the idea of creating the next big social networking scheme, Colemans company is geared toward helping companies manage their IT systems. Far less sexy than the next Facebook, but far more important to someone who would actually like to get a return on investment for all those IT dollars.
I asked Bill what he thought about the Dow Jones glitch. (I suppose "glitch" is too light a word for a mistake that may have erased a couple of billion dollars in stock value as trading indexes tied to the Dow suddenly had no Dow to guide them.) He said there were two avenues CIOs can take when their system investments go weak at the knees.
Click here to read more about the IT failures involved in the Feb. 27 stock market drop.
One, they can go back to the big hardware vendors with their tale of woe. The big system vendors will be glad to sell them overprovisioned systems that they will claim will carry the CIO through any emergency. Should that emergency take place and the systems fail, then the response will be to sell the customer even more systems. "But once the system reaches full capacity, thats it," Coleman told me over lunch in Bostons financial district.
In that approach, rather than looking for the weakest link in a chain, you sell the customer an entire new chain. And should that fail, you sell them yet another, heavier-gauge chain.
The other approach, and, yes, the one Cassatt is selling, would be to create a system that automatically looks for the weakest link and directs computing resources toward bolstering that link. This is not predictive computing, but applying computing resources in real time to real problems. This is a fundamentally different approach to computing and requires a system that is always aware of its resources and can direct resources far faster than any human operator could ever respond.
I am sure there will be lots of finger-pointing over the next couple months as both Dow Jones and the NYSE try to figure out what went wrong. Im not sure what systems Dow Jones runs on. The NYSE isIm fairly sure, and Im looking for clarificationusing an IBM system called TradeWorks
that was promoted with the claim of "Extreme Availability."
The interconnection of the Dow Jones systems and the NYSE and, moreover, the interconnection of all worldwide electronic trading systems doubtlessly offers new avenues for faster trading and for fortunes to made within moments. However, those fortunes can also be lost within moments. Earlier this week, traders went back to paper and posting trades on whiteboards in an attempt to keep the system moving.
Before you decide to buy a new, heavier chain to keep your IT system anchored, you might want to think about an approach that constantly inspects the strength of your current chain and in real time fixes the links that are faltering.
eWEEK magazine editor in chief Eric Lundquist can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis on servers, switches and networking protocols for the enterprise and small businesses.