|
|
|

Time Warner Broadband Plan Sparks Tiers of Fear
By: Roy Mark
2009-04-16
Article Rating:    / 2
There are 1 user comments on this IT Infrastructure story.
Time Warner's metered Internet pricing scheme is only a test, argues the cable industry, but Internet consumer watchdogs contend that it is a serious enterprise and only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what and how broadband service providers plan to deliver high-speed Internet services.The cable industry stepped forward April 15 and defended Time Warner Cable's
proposed tiered and metered Internet pricing scheme. Kyle McSlarrow, president
and CEO of the National Cable &
Telecommunications Association, cable's principal trade group, made a CableTechTalk
blog post supporting the idea of consumption-based broadband billing.
Time Warner is planning a four-city test of the pricing scheme that would offer
a basic tier of Internet access capped at 1GB per month for $15, with an extra
$2 for every additional gigabyte. Time Warner will also offer higher-capacity
plans ranging from $29 to $75, each with overage fees. Under the plan, the
highest possible Internet bill would be $150 per month, more than double what
current Time Warner customers typically pay for unlimited usage.
The pricing scheme has drawn a firestorm of criticism from customers, Internet
advocacy groups such as Free Press, and even Congress.
"Time Warner Cable has merely suggested that they are interested in
conducting a limited set of trials of a new pricing modelin a careful and
transparent mannerthat may serve the vast majority of their customers better
by reflecting the growing reality that some consumers utilize far more high-speed
bandwidth than others," McSlarrow wrote.
McSlarrow dismissed critics who have
called for Congress to investigate Time Warner's plans. He also slammed
Free Press, a perennial thorn in the cable industry's side, for its "tiresome"
complaints and the group's "shoot, ready, aim mentality."
"The Internet ecosystem seems to be one of the few really healthy, growing
and creative parts of our economy, with continued investment and innovation
taking place every day," he wrote. "At a time of economic and
financial challenges for our country, I for one would rather Congress spend its
time on real problems, not fictional ones."
McSlarrow's blog post seemed to do little to defuse the issue. Indeed, it
seemed only to add fuel to the fire.
Sen. Charles Schumer announced he plans to visit Rochester,
N.Y., one of Time Warner's test markets.
Schumer will hold a media event in Irondequoit,
N.Y., at the home of a Time Warner
customer. Schumer said he didn't want his constituents used as guinea pigs for
Time Warner's pricing schemes.
Rep. Eric Massa has already promised legislation to curb tiers, particularly in
areas where a broadband provider owns a monopoly on service.
Free Press had its own choice words for McSlarrow and the cable broadband
business.
"When a major national Internet service provider expands a practice from a
small trial to a big trial, it's a serious enterprise. And we can reasonably
expect it is the tip of the icebergand that we'll soon see other major ISPs
follow," Free Press Policy Director Ben Scott wrote from Germany,
where he is traveling on business. "We need only look at the banking
sector to note that erring on the side of caution when it comes to
congressional oversight is not a bad idea. Asking Congress for an inquiry is
simply raising some red flags about a plan that has many troubling questions
surrounding it."
Free Press Research Director Derek Turner told eWEEK there is nothing wrong in
the "abstract concept of tiered pricing plans," but said Time Warner's
plans are "completely divorced from economic reality." Turner
contends that Time Warner is trying to foist network upgrades on customers and
penalize use of new innovations.
"On Time Warner's lowest tier, they are saying you should not do anything
other than light Web surfing," Turner said.
|
|
x}v6EW-miXtΞHHbLd%w%
oP/Ig-`(
B;?{{~$rH5g6%E}"I{(~`\˩IZNڶ?
}~mkru ;{#|6%߽w *s=NNKVgMFھlMe#k_gp,cw5h{=D@~5{sr!&2}<K;="?*B#]2IXߦðuɷ~{Xe;'7 )*X^P~D;r#|=x:a/M˟lڮUX'[vB1BEۺwGI%_'uڪ8NQ F:pm3EkLN\^@Zˆ螥ɧ5u5I
1A 4cT8ne8DrHn6,
Ոj)1ᚑgO?-I|
p\.ܪa?WuomzV[uw#ϝ9yqL%X䈍YR'`>6)L|@ɤ:أZr$˺7h4öCٰ5T:Ԫr\ˇJy/^yxx?X>-Te4owFyRV5MQݫu0>
?up;XRrCvUs<>Ki^ad}+1~"
@D%\.'I"0i5tt4_MBn$:i#tyZj9,4E;
KHRS$XICF/XTU9Db9i5Ozgyk\ߴMk^ܴH>߈ekby1=b Jw"=[WKYK;7u")|qg5M0\̱8}Uo~\?-z'6l
Muô|WVK{YIuuJr,NewFqk_ CzJݖUL_ȻHȏKŗG)H73ǚ-md±(|ǺrN9~mE!oU:^T7o`H2&4 ?g}-w
z a6ZAu\
aלش6,%
hJ@{d$e$}ВYtBFͨN}%IFOςI5tO|BMk6
tI<
YC#ʠ:ڴ\Vc 4!D&
_aAh>[W <{ }
0&ԟr!DAЂMz>tT9]|2Z9<({hk=`DMWtCPDM}PCn@}S(|`OA=Z9{ݲeǀxԜ)u`Hd˕F}&@H>'hI#r
B ,`@n%`9 P
ab
.u@Gҥ;rjX*kR1eb -x[b~ILg2+IɴaX9yDMf#T`B[ᛥLKak`DݞrA+żMCFqiBZ9,)AzdE56Sq'3r@吖3tf3p#EQƔtÂ[x u|s8Z\ƈu*C=@3~~fAU Emh!Y3=we
M
l$T f DfO~5lwfr,_zv?GsҋS)_4I
R >5M+} 8C_gMcY!h($'pC!fR;=Mrʳ"#C_7X>ťHN(mt'й+>q^v.iC@ӬYKuooE[9(ĿKӺJ jp -H#o`koռE_xue8Hi K-CrB`}.E6GQ4dJ
&Ϳ]ϞZC>c+UVᏡLXVFV-iV9ִrX,y|p6X"@7w_M)mT.mT^Χީ;i6E;3w@>:`3ǟG
)a!c$Q+}neͨԪP-"|@(
K ؈|Ё*tdj²w7ה!.07&v*>
0f&6XC˦>ouqA̫%uDw֠~3KJAUcϓasMD@knV2&GmܡkC6fuEsƱ4St%ҶY 8 p_sk@l4$T2Paa0]elaؼ/kьN4:E809N܁el*IH-b]Pr(RDZ06Aae呯^x@MY2H$6/`k
@0 !/PTQ-W0.#Ƃ_L_LU1(TO"n»hC{X]>(D
i?aE"%t1ڥs!a*/+g \| ;OgjZ(T+1:ʪZJ:_V2{VN0fA>yLLZ<|˰"U`
|BZ_(ƨOMqс, `tV8wV;< |