|
|
|

House, Senate Split on E-Verify for Stimulus Package
By: Roy Mark
2009-02-11
Article Rating:    / 23
There are 35 user comments on this IT Management story.
As part of the U.S. economic stimulus package, the controversial E-Verify program now moves behind closed doors, where differences between the Senate and House versions will be worked out. The House version requires that all companies benefiting from stimulus money utilize the E-Verify system to prevent the hiring of illegal aliens, while the Senate rejects the notion.The U.S. Senate has put the kibosh on a
government initiative requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to use
an Internet-based electronic verification system to confirm that prospective
employees are legally eligible to work.
In the latest chapter of the saga, the Senate Feb. 9 eliminated the E-Verify
provisions the House put in its version of the $838 billion stimulus program.
The House version requires that all companies benefiting from stimulus money use
the E-Verify system to prevent the hiring of illegal aliens. The controversial
provision now moves behind closed doors as House and Senate negotiators thrash
out the differences in the two legislative packages.
The free E-Verify program is jointly operated by the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship
and Immigration Services in partnership with the Social Security Administration.
Approximately 100,000 employers are participating in the program, but some
employer groups have long complained that E-Verify program is too costly and
imperfect to justify mandatory use by federal contractors and subcontractors.
A Department of Homeland Security study claims that E-Verify database errors would
result in about 4,000 U.S. workers in every 1 million being initially denied
eligibility.
"The House bill stands strongly on the side of U.S. workers, while the
Senate bill stands firmly with the cheap labor business lobby," Dan Stein,
president of FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform), the nation's largest immigration reform group, said in a
statement. "We urge the conferees to keep faith with the American people
and include E-Verify protections for U.S. workers in the bill that is sent to President
Obama's desk."
Stein urged House leadership to resist pressure to strip
the E-Verify provisions from the conference bill. "Discussing the overall
bill, Speaker Nancy Pelosi cautioned that, 'We cannot let the perfect be the
enemy of the effective and the necessary,'" Stein said. "E-Verify has
a proven track record of effectiveness, and in an economy that shed 600,000
jobs last month alone, it is clearly necessary, and with a 99.6 percent
accuracy rate it is about as close to perfection as we are likely to get."
Under an executive order signed by former President George W. Bush, federal
contractors were to begin using E-Verify Jan. 15, 2009, but that deadline was pushed back to May 20 after
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed suit Dec. 23
challenging the legality of the program.
"The federal government agreed that the new
administration needs time to rethink mandatory E-Verify use, particularly in
light of the stressed economy," Robin Conrad, executive vice president of
the National Chamber Litigation Center, said in a statement. "We are
hopeful that the incoming administration will agree that E-Verify is the wrong
solution at the wrong time."
The Chamber
of Commerce's lawsuit challenges the government's use of a presidential
executive order coupled with a federal procurement law to make E-Verify
mandatory for federal contractors with projects exceeding $100,000 and for
subcontractors with projects exceeding $3,000. The Chamber of Commerce also
challenged the expansion of E-Verify to require the reauthorization of existing
workers.
Also joining in the lawsuit are the Associated Builders
and Contractors, the Society for Human Resource Management, the American
Council on International Personnel and the HR Policy Association.
| | Reader Comments: House, Senate Split on E-Verify for Stimulus Package | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | WOW!Alot of wetbacks on this one HAHAHAHAHA! Posted At: 02-24-09 By: hello | | | | | | Few WeeksWhat you did not protest when Bush was in power? Let this guy work he just have few weeks on power dealing with issues generated on Bush and... Posted At: 02-21-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleE-verify does work! For those of you who don't think so, how else should employers verify illegals from legals? Posted At: 02-19-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleSo now you want to change constitution? So it works fine when your grand parents arrive America but it doesn't now. Posted At: 02-18-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | I got in line.I got my Green Card in 1995, and naturalized in 2005. I have a job, obey the law and pay taxes. I don't see why other people can't do the same or... Posted At: 02-18-09 By: Alastair Gregory | | | | | | A user comment on this articleMarkJ has it right. We gladly welcome immigrants when they follow the rules. We have rules and limits for a reason. The US can't absorb the 100+... Posted At: 02-18-09 By: MikeK | | | | | | A user comment on this articleI think get in line is pretty straightforward. I don't care if the process is lengthy, unfair, confusing or expensive - it is the legal process. Just... Posted At: 02-18-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |
|
|
x}ks㶲*Q3皢HY#dKm)fIm"!1E=lrkn&-@n4wAȥ=&W1(ٟ:GMI}ݛ@BiZN)#C3WrD廚fw2v-S;^ 1 \?g#QY|8ԞTa@[2xs:&es/ب:`&`1Zl8lR!j
9a?[$)qL
ѻ81P(D|2ַ(>r@T| pTƦ;=aB49ʏш(@OwOȀYgF
G!YQZ-GZUqX'[~b8 䅠1FE8 40"A%;q8:I
hlUD`qiR13<LeC1k;R*ը65-晚u@|͖|#XulAzf@dnQ/*! lpq+x'C]tQV_5kYoAסߍ=gfdY&A.QM6Jۆ@ؼ?0HOL"j9˱,kFpf閩mȺuw*ґZ-NQY4yxx?9n^w?zU}͑ CK5-%4T\n:y\w>./-A6
|#k[ɿ0QT&*)rx2M2I>ajjg`rMwJQs7-GGEKDOr])2,R8Bf9mNMҺn7^[g79̲5<JEUa Jg3B~7uVۧkus#l}hz
GtH
W: NZ[_lxiķ"A |