Peter Coffee: In a world where too many companies (and their applications) work with too little data, Wolfram sets a good example with its latest version of Mathematica, which continues gathering new data to provide an evolving view of a problem.
It would be, at best, a gloomy satisfaction to be the person who wrote the reportreleased on September 11, 1998, if youre looking for painful ironiesthat predicted a "catastrophic" intelligence failure if American agencies funding priorities werent substantially revised.
Last weeks report
from the House Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security found the resulting systemic problems, such as widespread shortage of foreign-language skills, to be much greater threats to our security than bogeymen such as off-the-shelf encryption.
I was struck by an associated story
on National Public Radio, which noted that headquarters counter-terrorism staff had been expanded since that timebut that this larger analysis group had less raw material to analyze, thanks to a concurrent reduction in field intelligence collection assets during that same period. More analysis of less actual data? This may be the defining syndrome of the era of cheap computation, as people are tempted to do more of what costs less with every step down the Moores-Law curvewhile cutting back on the old-fashioned efforts that seem ever more "inefficient."
Its nice to see an exception to this trend in the latest release of Mathematica, version 4.2, from Wolfram Research,
in Champaign, Ill. A tool like Mathematica could encourage the introspective, "Im sure I can figure this out myself" approach that is embodied in company founder Stephen Wolframs
controversial book, "A New Kind of Science,"
now topping every true geeks summer reading list.
But even while Mathematicas continuing computational refinements
enable ever-deeper exploration of an isolated idea, the XML facilities
in the new releasecombined with the XML APIs now being exposed by many Web sitesalso make it a tool for going out into the world and collecting new raw facts. For example, during a conversation last week, Wolframs Director of R&D, Roger Germundsson, showed me that he could write an "AmazonSearch" function in Mathematica that would drop a formatted table of authors and titles meeting certain criteria into the middle of a Mathematica "notebook" document, querying the XML-based interface that Amazon makes available
for use by its retail partners.
Its also important that Mathematica 4.2 emphasizes enhanced tools for publishing its results,
as well as for collecting initial data. For a counterexample, look at the way that the House subcommittee formatted the online report that I hyperlinked above: Its a Word file, but all it contains is images of printed pages. Terrific: You need Word to open it, but it cant be indexed or searched or readily excerpted. How many ways can we do this wrong in a single, simple document?
Applications need continuing access to new data if theyre going to do anything more than confirm our initial hypotheses. Analysis needs to be shared, in ways that both expose our assumptions and make our results available as catalysts for others thinking. And enterprise applications, such as those for relationship management,
need to avoid making the mistake of thinking that more analysis can ever make up for having less, or lower quality, information from the real world.
Tell me how you keep your applications well informed.