Open Source Is Not
Linux "> Aras customers will be able to download its code, yet are not shackled to Aras as a software vendor. The license allows flexibility and the solutions can be used to deploy to as many users as needed. The source code can be changed, and users can contribute back to the project if they want to, he said. "I just described open source and I didnt have to use the word Linux to do it," Schroer added."Im not interested in a religious war about whats truly open source and whats not. What we need are products that meet our needs, at the right price, and which will play well in our existing sandbox of Unix and Linux-based applications," he told eWEEK. The move to an open distribution model has made implementing Aras solution about a third cheaper than its competitors, with further savings down the line as the company rolls Aras Innovator out beyond its initial use to help service its quality department and the processes they use, Henning said. The FSF recently moved to clarify inaccurate information about GPLv3. Click here to read more. Aras Schroer also points to the fact that the play with Microsoft takes open source as an idea to a different, and far bigger, audience, to IT professionals such as business analysts and programmers who know the Microsoft environment. "Heres a chance to offer a bigger audience something that is still very much open source in terms of beliefs, just a different agreement," he said. Helms agrees, noting that, if successful, Aras Innovator would put an open source product into the hands of a different type of user than previous products like OpenOffice.org have done. "Aras has a mature code base and has been in the product life-cycle management market for a while. Consequently, it might be able to keep up with the market and keep its code base working without any new software license sales," he said. The company is also in a business where customization is important, which could also generate support and consulting business. "However, Aras still has to prove it can make this transition and sustain a business on it. I look forward to seeing how it goes," Helms said. Asked if Aras has looked at using a license approved by the OSI (Open Source Initiative), Schroer said the company had looked at the GPL (General Public License), but when talking to its customers it encountered a lot of confusion with regard to the GPL. This has raised some customer concerns, particularly about whether they would have a legal obligation to submit back any changes they made to that open-source code. "The perception is that open source comes with this obligation, which is fine for programmers, but not concerned businesses," he said. Marc Lind, the vice president of marketing at Aras, said its business customers do not really understand the requirements of the GPL and were not prepared to be legally required to submit changes they made back to the project. Can Windows and open source learn to play nice? Click here to read more. "As we are talking about enterprise solutions rather then the infrastructure, basically all our business customers will be customizing our solutions to support their specific competitive practices," he said. The Microsoft Community License requires users to distribute that license along with any code they have changed and which they distribute. "But there is no requirement in this license that changes to the code have to be contributed back," he said. But Directions on Microsofts Helms feels that the Microsoft Community License is essentially an open-source license. "Theres a range of open-source licenses, from permissive to restrictive, but the right to modify and redistribute, which the Microsoft Community License offers, puts it on the permissive end," he told eWEEK. Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.
Some customers, like Dennis Henning, the IT manager for Ogihara America in Howell, Mich., want to do all of those things with their software.