Opinion: Although Linux & Open Source Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols once used IE on his Windows machines, he now finds Microsoft's browser seriously insecure and endorses open-source ones instead.
OK, I confess it: Ive used Internet Explorer a lot. After being a die-hard Netscape user, I finally got fed up with the sheer bulk of that browser and started using Internet Explorer on my Windows machines.
As time went on and open-source Mozilla matured,
I started using Mozilla as my main Linux Web browser and as my secondary Windows browser. This past Friday, though, I started installing Firefox, the browser-only side of Mozilla, on every one of my production Windows machines.
Why? Because Internet Explorer, like Outlook, has finally become, to my mind, a permanent security hole that masquerades as a useful application.
Strong words? Have you really thought about this latest exploit?
It could hit every
Internet Explorer (IE) browser that merely visited any page served by an infected Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Server).
No anti-virus program would stop it, no firewall would slow it down and no shipping IE security patch would even notice it. Visit the page, get the infection. It was that simple.
Oh, but the few thousand people running Release Candidate 2
of Windows XP Service Pack 2 were not vulnerable to the client-side attack. And if you were one of the very few people who had all of the current critical patches installed and were running IE with its security settings at "high," youd be OK. That leaves, oh, say, 95 percent of all IE users wide open to this attack. I feel so much better now.
And just how bad was this attack? Boys and girls, let me tell you, this was the worst security violation I have ever seen. But dont take my word for it.
Johannes Ullrich, a handler at the Internet Storm Center at The SANS Institute in Bethesda, Md., wrote,
"A large number of Web sites, some of them quite popular, were compromised earlier this week to distribute malicious code.
What sites were spreading the infections? We still dont know. Neither the security companies nor the businesses running the infected sites are talking. Since theyre not being any help, I can only suggest that you update your anti-viral software and run itnow.
The only other thing I can say is that sites running IIS 5, which hadnt been patched up to Aprils MS04-011,
were the ones targeted by this exploit. But, Im sorry to say, its still not clear that even sites that had been patched with MS04-011 were safe. There are reports that even patched IIS servers were infected.
Next page: It gets worse, much worse.