Linux Camp Takes New Tack on Kernel

 
 
By Peter Galli  |  Posted 2004-12-06 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

With a common goal of providing a more constant, smoother and faster development cycle, new technologies are being put directly into Linux kernel 2.6.x.

A stable and mature Linux kernel is enabling its chief developers to shift away from the common kernel development model to one that will result in more frequent releases.

Up to now, once a production Linux kernel was released, stabilized, patched and updated as a point release, any new feature or technology in progress was moved to a new development and test kernel.

But with a common goal of providing a more constant, smoother and faster development cycle, new technologies are being put directly into 2.6.x, while any move to start a 2.7 development tree is still many months away, Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, told eWEEK in an e-mail interview.

The current production 2.6 kernel was released in January, and its most recent version, 2.6.9, was released in October.

"There still hasnt been a single patch that has made me or Andrew [Morton, who maintains the 2.6 kernel] say, Hmm, that looks too fundamental; it really needs 2.7. So right now, Im trying to concentrate on being good about merging regular things into 2.6.x," Torvalds said. "Well see when we get to the point that people get too frustrated about something really disruptive that we need a 2.7.x.

"Right now I dont actually foresee anything in the next few months, but sometimes the eruptions happen suddenly," Torvalds wrote.

The goal in continuing to move new features and technologies into the production 2.6 kernel is to provide a more constant, smoother and faster cycle, in which new features are tested just once, rather than first in a development environment and again in the production release, said Dan Frye, vice president of IBMs Linux Technology Center, in Beaverton, Ore.

"Production versions have always had a large amount of new code flowing into them anyway, but it was flowing through the artificial construct of a development tree and having to be stabilized twice. So, the quality should go up and the development time down. If we find a quality issue, then we will have to rethink this," Frye said.

To read about a recent Linux phishing attack, click here. Frye speculated that there may be no need for a 2.7 kernel for a long time, if at all. "We are thrilled with the changes in the kernel development process, and we are seeing everything we and our customers need and care about going into 2.6.x, and that does not mean that interesting development is not going on," he said.

While some fundamental problems emerged a couple of times over the past six months, which built up pressure for a 2.7 kernel, the team figured out ways to break those problems down into manageable chunks for 2.6, Frye said.

An IT manager who requested anonymity said as long as the new process results in a stable, well-tested, reliable and secure operating system, he is comfortable with it. "New features and functionality are great, but only if the underlying system is secure and reliable," the manager said.

Next Page: New approach is working for vendors.



 
 
 
 
Peter Galli has been a financial/technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has been Investment Editor of South Africa's Business Day Newspaper, the sister publication of the Financial Times of London.

He was also Group Financial Communications Manager for First National Bank, the second largest banking group in South Africa before moving on to become Executive News Editor of Business Report, the largest daily financial newspaper in South Africa, owned by the global Independent Newspapers group.

He was responsible for a national reporting team of 20 based in four bureaus. He also edited and contributed to its weekly technology page, and launched a financial and technology radio service supplying daily news bulletins to the national broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation, which were then distributed to some 50 radio stations across the country.

He was then transferred to San Francisco as Business Report's U.S. Correspondent to cover Silicon Valley, trade and finance between the US, Europe and emerging markets like South Africa. After serving that role for more than two years, he joined eWeek as a Senior Editor, covering software platforms in August 2000.

He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise.

He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.

His interviews with senior industry executives include Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Linus Torvalds, the original developer of the Linux operating system, Sun CEO Scot McNealy, and Bill Zeitler, a senior vice president at IBM.

For numerous examples of his writing you can search under his name at the eWEEK Website at www.eweek.com.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel