Whereas what youve gotten from Microsoft is, well not that much over the past three years. Yes, there have been endless patches, but Microsoft has had to make those patches available for free for everyone since without them, the seemingly endless number of security exploits that Windows and its programs are subject to would wreck everyone using Microsoft products. Microsoft has been so busy fixing thingsand adding "features" that entrap companies into having to buy new and expensive Microsoft server infrastructure programsthat there really have been very little practical improvements in its programs.Oh, there have been good new Microsoft products as well. Server 2003 is, to my way of thinking, the best of the lot. But even in the Microsoft shops I know, most of them are perfectly happy with Windows 2000. I hear that about a lot of Microsofts new programs from Microsoft fans. They just dont see any compelling reason to upgrade. For these users, SA has become a burden, not a help. Looking ahead, as the first lot of SA licenses gets ready to expire, it gets worse. The only significant update on a Windows users horizon is Longhorn, which may or may not show up in 2006. Is it worth locking yourself in to Microsoft for what may prove to be a very troublesome desktop? Particularly when Linux desktops are improving by leaps and bounds? I dont think so. And Im willing to bet that Microsofts SA subscribers are going to agree with me. Red Hat users? They renew their licenses, albeit with some grumbling, at a 90 percent rate. Microsoft says it wont know what its SA renewal rates will look like until sometime in 2005. Hmm I wonder which one is doing better. I can make a pretty good guess, but I already know for a fact whos doing better in what theyre getting for their subscription money: Red Hats customers. eWEEK.com Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been using and writing about operating systems since the late 80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the way. Check out eWEEK.coms Linux & Open Source Center at http://linux.eweek.com for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.
I defy anyone to point out anything in Office 2003, for example, thats so much better than Office 2000 that youd want to upgrade from one to the other. I say this as someone, by the way, who uses Office 2000, 2003 and OpenOffice on a daily basis, and not as a Linux/open-source snob.