FUD Returns

 
 
By Steven Vaughan-Nichols  |  Posted 2005-02-18 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Some folks in the industry still remember that way back in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Microsoft tried to make it look like the DR-DOS operating system couldnt work.

To quote Brad Silverberg, a former Microsoft senior vice president, from a 1992 e-mail memo released to the public during the Caldera vs. Microsoft antitrust fight: "What the [user] is supposed to do is feel uncomfortable, and when he has bugs, suspect that the problem is DR-DOS and then go out to buy MS-DOS."

Yes, some of us from way back then are still around and writing about this business. And, we were also around when Microsoft finally paid Caldera a fistful of millions of dollars to settle the suit that developed from Microsofts attempts to crush DR-DOS.

Do you see any resemblance between what Microsoft did then and what its doing now? I do.

Over and above the principle of the thing, this attack on Wine is a big deal because there are more than 100,000 users using Wine or CrossOver Office to run Windows applications. Im one of them.

Im using Wine right now on the Linux desktop, Xandros Desktop 3, to write this article with Word 2000.

This issue goes way beyond individuals like me who are Linux fans. There are companies like Walt Disney, which went out of its way to improve Wine so that it could use it for a cost-effective way to run Adobe PhotoShop on Red Hat Linux. Wine and CrossOver Office are used in business, and as the Linux desktop continues to catch on, youre going to see more users wanting their old, familiar applications but running on a cheaper, more-secure operating system.

Thats the back-story behind Microsofts action. This is another sign that Microsoft sees that Linux poses a real threat to its Windows desktop monopoly.

This is a big deal. Microsoft should fix WGA so that users who are running legal Microsoft software can run it on the platform of their choice. If not, well, DR-DOS may have retired to near obscurity, but Microsoft still ended up having to pay Caldera millions. When all is said and done, should Microsoft get off so lightly if it persists in going down this road again?

eWEEK.com Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been working and writing about technology and business since the late 80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the way.

Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest open-source news, reviews and analysis.


 
 
 
 
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is editor at large for Ziff Davis Enterprise. Prior to becoming a technology journalist, Vaughan-Nichols worked at NASA and the Department of Defense on numerous major technological projects. Since then, he's focused on covering the technology and business issues that make a real difference to the people in the industry.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date
Rocket Fuel