Facebook User Loyalty Will Trump Google+ Novelty
5. Mobility is an essential feature
Mobile
platforms continue to be a key factor in the success of Facebook. For the
millions of people around the globe who own an iPhone, snapping a photo with
the camera and uploading to their Facebook profile with the social network's
mobile app is a cinch. The same can be said on Android. With an iPad
application coming sooner rather than later, expect Facebook to continue to
capitalize on the popularity of mobile platforms to grow its own business,
which will allow it to maintain its dominant position versus Google+.
6. Think about the revenue
Facebook's
advertising platform could also help the social network stay one step ahead of
Google+. For now, the search giant's project doesn't offer a way for
advertisers to capitalize on the service's membership. Facebook, on the other
hand, has an advertising platform that companies around the globe are
capitalizing on. In fact, eMarketer reported earlier this year that Facebook's
ad revenue is set to explode from about $1.86 billion last year to more than $4
billion this year. In 2012, that figure will grow again to nearly $6 billion.
That indicates that advertisers are engaged, and as long as they stay with
Facebook, it won't need to worry about Google+.
7. The groups issue
One
of best and worst features of Google+ is Circles. The feature is, simply, a way
for people to group different folks into different groups and allow users to
share only some content with certain people. On paper, it's a great feature.
But the question is, do people really want to spend time organizing groups in
such a way? Facebook's Groups feature is far more straightforward, allowing
everyone within the group to see everyone else. The Google+ Circles feature
isn't so open. What's more, its functionality is a bit confusing for new users.
As one of the hallmark features of Google+, Circles falls short.
8. People are loath to switch their entire
social effort
MySpace
notwithstanding, people around the globe are not very willing to move their
entire social effort to another social network. As Twitter has proven, people
will use multiple social networks. But to think that Facebook users will ditch
their profiles and all their friends for a social network that has an extremely
small number of users compared with their old favorite is nonsense. In the
average user's mind, Google+ is a complement to Facebook and something worth
trying out; it's not a replacement.
9. Core competencies need to be considered
Whenever
two companies are pitted against each other, it's important to consider what
they're best at. Facebook excels at social networking, which is central to its
business. Google, on the other hand, is a search company that also offers
advertising platforms, a mobile operating system, and much more. Facebook
"gets" social networking. Google "gets" search. But does Google really "get"
social networking? That's up for debate.
10. Early growth isn't the full story
Much
of the talk surrounding Google+'s ability to take Facebook down revolves
around the service's early growth. Recent reports suggested Google+ has
reached 10 million users, and could hit 20 million by the end of the weekend.
While that might be the case, early success does not mean long-term growth.
Google has a long way to go to make its Google+ service popular and worthwhile,
and talk of it vanquishing Facebook because of its recent successes just
doesn't add up.
Follow Don Reisinger on Twitter by
clicking here









