|
|
|

SAAS E-Mail from Google, Microsoft Proves Cost Effective for Up to 15K Seats
By: Clint Boulton
2009-01-06
Article Rating:    / 0
There are 1 user comments on this Messaging & Collaboration story.
SAAS E-Mail from Google, Microsoft Proves Cost Effective for Up to 15K Seats (
Page 1 of 2 ) Google, Microsoft, Cisco, Yahoo and others have plenty of pie to chow down on in the market for messaging and collaboration SAAS. Forrester Research sees value in cloud-based e-mail, finding it less expensive than on-premise solutions up to 15,000 seats. What side of the fence is your business on, or does it use a hybrid on-premise/cloud approach?Long relegated as a parlor trick for small businesses, hosted or SAAS (software as a service) e-mail systems from Google, Microsoft, Yahoo Zimbra, Cisco PostPath and others have become more viable in the low-end of large enterprises.
SAAS or cloud-based e-mail systems are cost effective for companies or
divisions up to 15,000 users, determined Forrester Research analyst Ted
Schadler, who surveyed IT professionals at 53 North American and
European enterprises to find out where they run their e-mail and other
messaging and collaboration services.
Schadler found that while cloud-based email has historically appealed
to small businesses, the costs and hassles of managing on-premise
e-mail combined with the growing capabilities of Google, Microsoft and
others means that SAAS providers' sweet spot is growing to customers
with up to 15,000 mailboxes. Schadler added:
The crossover point for when generic cloud-based email is cheaper
than on-premise e-mail is about 15,000 users. While many factors,
including staffing efficiency, mailboxes per server, and operating
systems costs, can move this crossover point, this 15,000-user
crossover is a rule of thumb that is validated by the number of firms
of this size moving to a hosted Exchange provider.
For example, the cost per user, per month for cloud shops of 25,000
users was $23.05 per user, per month, while the on-premise cost for the
same amount of users was $22.52. However, Schadler found that nothing
beats Google on price.
As has been widely documented, Google set the stage for low-cost e-mail
and archiving in the cloud with the launch of Google Apps Premier
Edition for $50 per user, per year, or $4.17 per user, per month).
Factoring in costs for staffing and message archiving and Schadler puts
the total at $8.47 per use, per month.
Schadler said he believes Google can make money at this price, while
properly servicing bigger customers like Genentech and Avago
Technologies. Google made a believer out of Serena Software, which is moving its employees to Gmail, and possibly additional Google Apps.
|
|
x}r8s;iW1ŋvI-5m[KUEB!)_w~⼜؟oL I"-R9\QD d"3H$$3W7-gB]saS;s͡O
Z%>;͂()k1ms Hnwݶ&N`P'^ > \?g3QY|ԎTadJ4hjlB|hLP_ƾQ8ƻ-Lb8&q *Nմn<شY$)Oh]
>QQږy@6ǮH;*#7ܙx8ӽ/DeO^b&{Bq<5;^2`~|!k`TmalڮUX'[vx) B,#"F\ςwCI%'-r'Ӥbf\LÑc3kT%R>lYG|ݑ|YcX:Q æq/#!꿩$
¥0FOlˇ;)xC'ס"'e5]Gq3܅cg|ZeNXj% ?q7uJazH&5\O, "S˾,ft0eȆ}sJC+AV6rYrwwWӽmY[8~1_~)UUq^H QPwÑ;7@Qm+Iu]+i
U;yԺ} g d}#5*%`ZJ$_S::yXB,=54Y01\]^4$32ǽó)H|]:1 2tǷP[,w.
R&JGX*,>JA͢4o߶If@[)@m?k:6
6kiJuV!`Fºm 49,蟩$m4@r5XSl RMF4'O
XRU>hI"A[T}OW%ތEĆ> z%K5bO}yx1zY[5'jtamEiS[ӲKsI|eO~S3G#вnZ3榣V6b1W*P\?(ËJCU~_p-~qj2BcLt/젨lA`&:~g|>5G$!|БdmxqZ.S+ЍE Xn`6haNh1[ <]{ #
0fԟ7ZLP#AтMz>tT8]|2Z9ܹ
L&z5I#ˋ0P6=xBe^~}¢1O [>ȁ=woouG
&QsaPBx??Ȝk)
Xt=JIIL"D% T
h4AZEENmbo$ow$]VI+RaD8T*nOu$wV*2ڹLX)QY,p[/ ͙JRd0u Q="`&Qea*0pRx5Q7m7e@:|:IoBg<0uu=\XIڰ-|' :G4$f.*dyLg0sO<sE Mh?wܠH}K:fXfZ1k.`JaǺ@dҬiB7gƩeLI|B3=
I8M;luVmEQ\'1nUK\f;aM9+v6P0*SMrJ9;m97 y_MMUPS7˕L4+uPM
g2)*[hs< 9:
Os1r@uOSjrH1g0dz7[Oq=137RtgZC+>q^i:[@\gKVZqd(U3%fcPWu JiO_&9&ۊ8eqfP6BHD@CR)Ե
ҚaY^`(y!
Cx
EF҆·=k}0\Re_m
}dҶMjګY37ld tAqFAݔ`,@ELl5TH թw:hzM>=r=6# ph>JeHw>uJkX"lM
M=t%hx#e\6XbO`8[%0[8,'uaOhK3Wk<'UC8`
;DӜh2FñeHu߲ӞW+H>LZ`!?ՊRRIO5 &^PGed^`M`Rcݻ| :lF֝sirn9 HzHS"5z!|
jjx0A$cכř¨0qqغEoXySk6'wp H}[ܑM;$!O_'%E&x.5 d1'$o+:|#XE~H> |