The Hidden Costs of a Google Phone

 
 
By Don Reisinger  |  Posted 2009-11-30 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


5. The iPhone model is not best

Although Apple's approach with the iPhone has been successful, it's really not the best way to be doing business in the mobile market. Apple's success in the cell phone industry is the exception, not the norm. And to be forced to improve hardware while monitoring software just isn't ideal. It's costly. Google has made the right move by offering software to other vendors. Why change course now?

6. There are greater opportunities in operating systems

It's important for Google to remember that software offers the best business opportunities. It can continue to profit from the sale of each Android-based device, while improving its software to attract other vendors and consumers. There has always been big money in operating systems. That won't change any time soon.

7. Carrier confusion

Assuming Google releases a Google Phone, will it be available on multiple carriers or will it be exclusive to a single carrier? It's not an easy decision for Google to make. Apple has made the industry believe that being tied to a single carrier is the best idea. But as the Palm Pre and BlackBerry Storm have shown, it's not. And as a software provider, Google must maintain strong ties with multiple carriers. Entering into an exclusive deal (or eschewing a couple of carriers) just isn't an option. Why get muddied in carrier politics?

8. Does Google really need it?

I understand why Motorola wants to release an Android-based phone. But why would Google? The company is extremely successful. Its online business is booming; it's well on its way to releasing an operating system that could revolutionize the software market; and in the last few months, Android has started to take root in the mobile business. Things are going well for Google. Why chance it with a smartphone?

9. It's a slippery slope

Releasing a smartphone quickly turns into a slippery slope. Within 24 hours of the release, the company will receive reports that there are issues affecting its phones. From there, it will need to address them before they get out of hand. As time goes by, Google will need to continue dealing with those problems and keep track of what competing manufacturers are doing while it prepares for a follow-up device. When that phone is released, the clock starts all over again. Software is far more manageable, has a longer market cycle and can be controlled more effectively than hardware.

10. Hardware is an expensive game

Developing software is expensive. But after an operating system is developed, it requires iterative updates over several years to be improved. It's not so cost-intensive after the initial investment. But hardware is entirely different. If the Google Phone is successful, the search giant will undoubtedly enter into an "arms race" against the iPhone. And in the process, it will need to improve its software more rapidly, all while ensuring that the Google Phone itself stays a step ahead of the iPhone. That could significantly increase Google's cost basis, and, in turn, reduce its profit margins.

It's just not worth it.




 
 
 
 
Don Reisinger is a freelance technology columnist. He started writing about technology for Ziff-Davis' Gearlog.com. Since then, he has written extremely popular columns for CNET.com, Computerworld, InformationWeek, and others. He has appeared numerous times on national television to share his expertise with viewers. You can follow his every move at http://twitter.com/donreisinger.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel