Verizon's Handset Offer Continues to Draw Fire (
Page 1 of 2 )
Verizon's July 17
offer to limit exclusive handset deals to six months and make the
devices available to the nation's smallest carriers continues to be
dismissed by critics as an empty political gesture meant only to stave
off possible legislation.
The exclusive handset deals offered by carriers have already gained the attention of Congress with the Senate Commerce Committee holding a hearing June 17 questioning the practices of wireless carriers. Unlike wireline services, which are required by law to
allow consumers to connect the legal devices of their choice to
carriers' networks, the wireless market is pocked with exclusive deals such as AT&T's arrangement with Apple's iPhone.
"Effective
immediately for small wireless carriers (those
with 500,000 customers or less), any new exclusivity arrangement we
enter with handset makers will last no longer than six months – for all
manufacturers and all devices," Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdam
wrote to Rep. Rick Boucher, chairman of the U.S. House Energy and
Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the
Internet.
Since the letter
was made public, a firestorm of criticism has followed. The latest
group to dismiss Verizon's offer is a coalition of MAP (Media Access
Project), Free Press and the Consumers Union.
"In response to...political
pressure, Verizon Wireless has taken a small step in the right
direction. However, the impact of this action is largely insubstantial,
and benefits few consumers," the groups wrote to Boucher in a July 20 letter. "Furthermore,
industry self-regulation cannot be a substitute for meaningful consumer
protection laws, particularly in a market that demonstrates
insufficient competition."
MAP Vice President Parul P. Desai added in a statement, "[The]
attempt by Verizon to limit concerns over its exclusive handset deals
with mobile device manufacturers falls short of serving the public
interest. It is clear Verizon continues to embrace and defend unlimited
handset exclusivity practices for all consumers, save a small minority.
The fight for greater access and innovation in our wireless market is
far from over."
The groups note that only five percent of the
nation's carriers have 500,000 subscribers or less. The letter to
Boucher also points out that a six-month period
of handset exclusivity could result in as much as 15 months of
exclusivity in practice, considering the time it takes for
carriers to bring new handsets onto the market.
"Fifteen months in the handset market is the difference between 'cutting edge' and 'obsolete.'
Without the ability to negotiate for all devices, the Verizon Wireless
offer does not offset this harm," the groups stated in their letter to
Boucher. "The better solution is to encourage manufacturers to make
interoperable phones from the outset by doing away with any exclusive
deals in the wireless market."