Google launches Google Social Search from Google Labs Oct. 26. The experiment is designed to make search results more relevant by mining the rich Google profile information users provide. This includes all Gmail contacts and Gmail chat buddies, as well and people users are publicly connected to on social sites such as Twitter and FriendFeed. Not Facebook though. If there's Web content written by contacts relevant to the search query, Google's algorithm will sniff the content out and serve it up at the bottom of the search results page in a section called "Results from people in your social circle."Google Oct. 26 released Google Social Search, the company's stab at making
search more personally relevant by putting content from searchers' contacts
directly into search results.
Users must opt in to use the experimental service from Google Labs here. Google
Social Service requires users to have a Google profile and be logged into their
Google account. This is important because Google essentially builds a bridge
between users' Google accounts and their Google profiles, surfacing users'
content in what Google calls a "social circle."
This social circle includes users of social services Google users have
listed in their Google profile. This includes all Gmail contacts and Gmail chat
buddies, as well and people users are publicly connected to on social sites
such as Twitter, FriendFeed and Google Picasa.
Those people you follow on Twitter and FriendFeed? They'll fall in the
Google Social Search parameters, and content they post on those public Websites
could show up in your Social Search results if it is relevant.
Users of Google Reader will also see blog posts from some of the Websites
they've subscribed to as part of the social search results. Facebook, fiercely
protective about what content it lets search engines index, is notably absent
in this experiment.
Here's how it works. Users must log into Google and do a search. If there's
Web content written by contacts relevant to the search query, Google's
algorithm will sniff the content out and serve it up at the bottom of the
search results page in a section called "Results from people in your
social circle."
What kind of content will Google Social Search surface from your friends?
Anything from restaurant reviews on Yelp to movie reviews on IMDB.com. Or it
could simply be tweets or status updates.
Google Social Search Technical Lead Maureen Heymans and Google Product Manager
Murali Viswanathan said they created Social Search to help users find publicly
available content from friends that Google wouldn't normally return so easily
in the traditional, impersonal regular search results. They explained:
"A lot of people write about New York,
so if I do a search for [new york]
on Google, my best friend's New York
blog probably isn't going to show up on the first page of my results. Probably
what I'll find are some well-known and official sites. ... When I do a simple
query for [new york], Google Social
Search includes my friend's blog on the results page under the heading 'Results
from people in your social circle for New York.'"
Heymans, who noted users can filter results to see only content from their
social circle by clicking "Show options" on the results page and
clicking "Social," also provides this quick video demo here.
Google's search quality guru Matt Cutts walks through Social Search in more
detail here, stressing that users who aren't signed into their Google
account won't see their friends' content. Users can also delete social service
links on their Google Profiles to prevent the content from being indexed. Search
Engine Land's
Danny Sullivan has a detailed walk-through here.
Marissa Mayer, vice president of search products and user experience for
Google, announced the experiment at the Web 2.0 Summit Oct.
21. Mayer said then the launch was a few weeks away, but apparently Google
decided the cake was baked well enough for users to bite.
Google is joining a space populated by Aardvark, ChaCha, Mahalo and several
others. How Google's emergence in social search will affect those providers is unclear.