Hunch Decision Engine Hatches as Google, Microsoft Alternative
By: Clint Boulton
2009-06-15
Article Rating:    / 4
Hunch, a new decision engine from Yahoo Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake, goes public after raking in 40,000-plus beta testers. An alternative to ChaCha, Mahalo and Yahoo Answers, Hunch is a deviation from search engines such as Microsoft Bing and Google, offering recommendations to users in a crowdsourcing, collaborative fashion. Couldn't businesses benefit from Hunch's approach to making recommendations to users?
Hunch, the widely anticipated new crowdsourcing project from Yahoo
Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake, launched to the general public June
15 in the form of a decision engine to help users, well, make decisions.
Hunch, which will inevitably be helped by Microsoft's
plan to throw $80 million in marketing dollars toward Bing, its erstwhile
Google-killing decision engine, is geared to help users make choices based on
information they provide. Hunch relies on crowdsourcing, building on the
collective participation of its users (currently 40,000-plus from the beta
version).
While Bing is still a search engine at heart like Google—letting users enter
keywords and queries to find information on a variety of topics—Hunch culls
information from users by asking them questions about topics. Hunch explains in its FAQ
page:
"When Hunch proposes a decision result, it will also show you why it
proposed what it did. If you disagree with some of the reasoning, you can
correct it. If you think Hunch missed asking a crucial question, you can submit
one. And if you think Hunch is missing a good result, you can add that, too.
Hunch collects and organizes all this input so that it becomes smarter for the
next user."
For example, to find out whether or not one would be interested in working at a
startup company versus an entrenched
player with brand solidity, Hunch asks the user a series of related
questions to help the user make a decision.
Specific questions for this startup topic include: Do you want to work
somewhere that encourages newcomers to question the status quo?
Users can choose: "Yes, I want to be able to influence how the company
goes about things," or "No, I prefer to work where there is a well-established
way of doing things," or skip the question if they opt to.
Yes or no questions are common, but there are also multiple-choice questions.
Hunch weighs the user's answers in total and, based on how a user responds,
concludes whether or not he or he would be happy at a startup or more
comfortable at an established company.
There are some 2,500 topics and counting. The more users forge new topics or
participate in existing ones, the smarter Hunch gets because it builds on the
answers participants provide it. The more people participate, the better
informed the engine's offered choices will be, which will in turn makes
decision-making better for a user.
So how does Hunch make money? Basically by serving as an e-commerce referral
system. According to the Hunch FAQ, certain decision result pages on Hunch link
to external sites, such as Amazon.com or Best Buy, where users can purchase the
product or service that Hunch proposed.
Should users buy the suggested product or service, Hunch may earn a referral
fee from the merchant. But fear not the obvious potential payola shenanigans:
Hunch claims the presence of a link to a retailer has no effect on the decision
outcomes Hunch proposes.
This is much more of a decision engine than Microsoft's Bing; Hunch will no
doubt benefit from Microsoft's use of the phrase decision engine to describe
its revamped Live Search. The real test will be whether or not Bing, Fake's
evangelism and old-fashioned word of mouth exposure will help Hunch blossom.
Fake said in a blog post that,
starting today, users can use Hunch without logging in, "though of course
Hunch’s hunches are much better if you do."
Hunch will also give bloggers code to post widgets. There’s also a new Explore
page, which Hunch will keep updated with new topics, new users and "those
interesting correlations that are the byproduct of all our question-answering
technology."
“Five years ago, maybe even three years ago, we
couldn’t build a product like Hunch," Fake told Search
Engine Land's
Matt McGee. “Hunch had its way paved by Wikipedia and Yahoo Answers. It’s
become more acceptable” to have crowdsourced, collective knowledge Websites.
Perhaps, but will users lend a hand to help Hunch tap the wisdom of crowds? As
McGee notes, the Hunch experience is more gradual than other Q&A engines,
building on the crowds and rendering information iteratively, like a Wikipedia
page.
The real question is whether something like Hunch will ever be ported to
enterprise scenarios. Couldn't businesses benefit from Hunch's approach to
making recommendations to users?
 |
|