Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said he
expects Google, not antitrust authorities, to provide the stiffest competition
to its search and search ad deal with Yahoo, which Microsoft and Yahoo
formalized July 29.
In the deal, which the companies expect to close in early 2010, Microsoft's
Bing search engine will power Yahoo's search. Yahoo will become the exclusive
worldwide relationship sales force for both companies' search advertisers. See
live blogging notes here at Search Engine
Land.
The deal is aimed at improving both companies' chances in the search engine
market versus Google, whose 65 percent share leads the world. Microsoft and
Yahoo hold 8.4 percent and 19.6 percent, respectively.
During a conference call to discuss the 10-year deal, Ballmer was asked what
sort of opposition Microsoft expected to face as it seeks to spur the Yahoo
deal toward approval in early 2010.
After a pause, Ballmer said he expected to face opposition from Google.
However, in a moment that recalled how characters in the Harry Potter book
series can't bring themselves to say the name of the evil lord Voldemort,
Ballmer didn't explicitly say the name of the search engine giant. Of course,
that didn't stop him from taking a shot at Google in his reply:
"We suspect we will face some opposition from the—I would say
competitors—but it's really the competitor who may not like more competition
because we actually think this is one of those cases where us coming together
will actually provide more effective competition to the market leader, not
less. So, certainly we would expect the competitor to be aggressive."
Ballmer also addressed potential antitrust regulatory concerns:
"Now, obstacles ... I don't know, we think we have a good case on how
this improves competition in the market. It's good for consumers, the
advertiser and the publisher, and obviously we'll be called upon to present
that case in D.C. and Brussels and other places, but it's all been looked at
extensively by counsel both at Microsoft and Yahoo."
Ballmer then kicked it over to Microsoft's and Yahoo's legal counsels to
chime in. Brad Smith, senior vice president, general counsel and corporate
secretary for Microsoft, jumped at the chance to defend Microsoft's deal with
Yahoo. He had no qualms about saying the name "Google," but couched
it by saying, "a company like Google."
"We look forward to moving forward very quickly to provide information
to the antitrust authorities in Washington
and in Brussels and in other places
around the world. We've been working together. We expect to start the filing
process in Washington, D.C.,
next week. As Steve said, there is a compelling case that this is going to
increase competition. We anticipate that advertisers are going to recognize the
better value that this generates. Web publishers are going to recognize the
better generation that this is going to unleash.
"As to what a company like Google will do, that will obviously be their
call. They have 78 percent of the market worldwide for paid search. I don't
know of any other instance where a company with that kind of market share
endeavor sought to oppose a deal where two smaller companies have come
together, but they'll make their own decision and we'll look forward to the
debate."
That's right. You just read Smith call Microsoft a smaller company than
Google. In terms of search, Microsoft's 8.4 percent compared with Google's 65
percent share is small to the point of embarrassment.
But Google has a shade under 20,000 employees. Microsoft has over 90,000.
Google did $21 billion in sales last year. Microsoft notched $60 billion.
Microsoft is not smaller.
Update: How is Google taking this Microhoo announcement? A Google spokesperson told eWEEK: "There has
traditionally been a lot of competition online, and our experience is that
competition brings about great things for users. We're interested to
learn more about the deal." AllThingsDigital has other thoughts on the matter.
Google isn't the only one that might have concerns. The Center for Digital
Democracy told eWEEK last week that Microsoft and Yahoo should expect privacy
and consumer groups to "vigorously press" regulators to closely
examine the deal.
At the least, the CDD wants regulators to impose a series of tough
conditions on data collection practices, including making their online
marketing systems more transparent.