Regulatory pressure on Google's $750 million acquisition bid for AdMob is
mounting after a U.S.
senator raised questions about the proposal in a letter to the Federal Trade
Commission.
Sen. Herb Kohl, chairman for the subcommittee on antitrust, competition
policy and consumer rights, wrote that the deal raises concerns about
competition that need to scrutinized by the Federal Trade Commission.
AdMob, which Google offered to acquire in November 2009, makes
mobile ad technology that Google wants to combine with its own mobile ad assets
to improve the delivery of ads on smartphones and the applications that run on
them.
IDC has said Google and AdMob combined
would command 24 percent of the market, hardly a monopoly position, but it
would certainly make Google the leader in the space. Google is accustomed to
this role, drawing on its massive 65 percent search share on U.S.
desktops to make billions from keyword-based ads.
Mobile providers such as Millennial Media and Jumptap cheered the AdMob deal, but Google was prepared for naysayers,
arguing that the mobile ad market is young and there are plenty of competitors
in the sector.
Apple, which reportedly also bid for AdMob before Google swooped in with a larger offer, validated Google's claim by
moving to buy Quattro Wireless. Apple will reportedly unveil its mobile ad platform April 8, further supporting
Google's picture of a competitive market.
Reportedly, the FTC asked Google rivals for their reaction to the AdMob bid. The
FTC and Kohl apparently fear Google will duplicate its desktop domination on
mobile phones. Kohl wrote in the April 6 letter, addressed to FTC Chairman
Jonathan Leibowitz:
"Critics of this transactions
worry that this deal will allow Google to merge with one of its biggest rival
mobile advertising competitors, and leverage its dominance of PC-based search
advertising market into the emerging mobile advertising market, particularly
with respect to advertising embedded in smart phone applications."
The nascent mobile ad market promises the opportunity to generate billions
of dollars for those who successfully enter it in a short period. Consumers are
using smartphones such as the iPhone and Android-powered devices such as the
Motorola Droid and Nexus One to surf the Web, network with friends and play
games. The more time users spend accessing the Web from their mobile devices,
the greater the opportunity for Google, Apple and others to put advertising in
front of them.
"It is therefore of vital importance to be wary of any transaction that
would create undue market dominance of search or application-based advertising on
mobile devices such as smartphones," Kohl said. "Allowing any one
firm to dominate this market could result in higher prices for mobile
advertising on the Internet and with respect to smartphone applications, and
also could result in lower revenues realized by applications developers."
Kohl also cautioned that if Google gets AdMob it will have access to data
about millions of smartphone users' Web activities, including search and
product preferences.
This is exactly what makes AdMob so valuable to Google, potentially allowing
it to better tailor ads to owners of iPhones and Android-based smartphones.
Kohl urged the FTC to make sure Google will adequately protect user privacy if
the group opts to approve the deal.
Kohl's letter reads like preaching to the choir, if a report from the Wall
Street Journal is to be believed. The Wall Street Journal reported that the FTC has built a litigation team (paywall) for if the agency
chooses to block the deal, and has briefed Congress on the merger.