|
|
|

10 Reasons Why Google Android Is Secure
By: Don Reisinger
2009-11-02
Article Rating:    / 11
There are 15 user comments on this Network Security & Hardware story.
10 Reasons Why Google Android Is Secure (
Page 1 of 2 ) News Analysis: Google's Android platform is a relatively secure operating system. It has a number of features that make it a fine alternative to the iPhone. But it's important for users to understand just how Google built security into the mobile operating system.The debate over which mobile platformiPhone, Android, Windows Mobile or
BlackBerryis best might rage for hours. Everything is subjective. But it's
security that may matter most when considering a mobile phone.
Will the phone provide the kind of security required when important data is
transmitted from the desktop to the mobile device? That's a question that can't
be so easily answered with a yes or no.
That's why it's so important to consider
each mobile platform's security on a case-by-case basis. The iPhone has
received the most accolades. But Google's Android platform is circling in the
background. Slowly but surely, Google's software is gaining steam. It's becoming
a much bigger player in the mobile market. And all the while, it has
maintained a relatively high level of security.
Let's take a look at why it's so secure.
1. Open source
Open-source software tends to be more secure than closed software. That's
mainly due to the nature of open source: The community works together to
improve software. It's a great concept. And unlike Microsoft and Apple, it's a
concept that Google
and its partners have embraced. Open source is a key to security victory.
2. Multiprocess software
Rather than running each application in one process, Google's Android
platform is multiprocess software, so that each application runs within its own
process. Thanks to that, Google can ensure that no application gains access to
critical components of system software.
3. Say hello to Linux
Linux is an extremely secure operating system. And it just so happens that
Google's Android platform is based on Linux. The operating system has several
features such as user and group IDs that help keep application data away from
core software processes. Linux is a major reason why Google's Android platform
has enjoyed relative security to this point.
4. Access restrictions
Access restrictions are central to the security of any operating system. In
Android, no application has permission to perform operations that could harm
the operating system. The same architecture keeps those applications from running
harmful scripts that affect other applications or the user. Thanks to that
feature, users know that their sensitive data won't be touched by unauthorized
applications.
5. Sign this, please
If trouble breaks out, knowing who wrote a particular application not only
helps users identify the culprit, but also ensures that in the future that
source won't be trusted. All Android applications require a signature unique to
the application's developer. The result is twofold: it assigns a level of
culpability to poorly designed software and it helps determine access to
signature-based permissions. That combines to make attackers think twice about
specifically targeting Android.
| | Reader Comments: 10 Reasons Why Google Android Is Secure | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | What a steaming pileAndroid security has been a joke. When it first came out, there was the severe browser vulnerability (from Android's inherited open source code, by... Posted At: 11-05-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | Asking for permissionThe
8. Asking for permission
Feature is called UAC in Windows Vista, do you remember how much the people blame this great security feature? Posted At: 11-05-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | | | | | | | Linux, Mac, Android and everythingDave above posted:
Open source software *can* be, and is, reviewed by any number of developers and security researchers; the track record supports... Posted At: 11-04-09 By: cbrp1r8 | | | | | | A user comment on this articleAnd do you have specifics to back this up? Simply saying that something is secure does not make it so. Linux hasv more vulnerabilities that Windows,... Posted At: 11-04-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | Example from Apple: QuickTime"The only real concern would be if there are portions of a system that are closed source, since they can't, by definition, undergo the widespread... Posted At: 11-03-09 By: Derek Currie | | | | | | Mac OS X ≠ Linux, Linux ≠ Unix'adn' sez Mac OS X is Linux. No.
Correction: Mac OS X = certified Unix. Linux is a completely different, not related, Open Source operating that... Posted At: 11-03-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |
|
|
x}kw6DىCoْۚ-nO9Z$!)Jvr[/=hɏs-`P*
w~> IMל۔O]sSãw$5C2I=*_rdz&9%GjL7 R}f]S k 5Gl&J AT1R
Ɠ5>X1=/[S}L}q^~l.hvL⎲IlG
tuG`azN$E%k4EhD>vn3gGdYu(X(QuB,M˟mڮU ۭؓ@5l"s9ȹ׳ 03dc7l#205b )V,#&3ýе:sz08ryj5jfO-=K;O=k\w=jP?bA2xư!$ne$D7l6XpaRچg?-IbH8CEn] ؾtsyHnU$ENX*o~cn!LjXvL<:CYͼaF3l˸;4
HSKVUBX)ڑx>o9{ۖ3p*sgyÝ|k7~+eUvѻ]H C[wn
-%;ZAP\tNi\v?
ǁ#ñ @'?VjLT)Jj\(ML0h5& :^gN{_ x[ԊhGZAAvIna̳|3+i3*5dNߒ-~k~>E,[3sAT4
̠K`WkeP9m<_st.[ݛ9^VKCV=BCj`BӹciuZʿupsO{:$~~z>5401\]Z-$532IULxy$Y)r"8_ CjݖeB_ȻX_KŗG)H73ǚ -mdʩ$ S'Gk__ӬZxka
4+@_x0ND9fMs,eg{0A M)61tk
3!RBʼĿIK
_VPJB-)\Dh+Ԍ$ٛ"G;Cxr!DKI88{NR.iغ\48?כUsNVVt];3eяzZTpx3n]u/{]t0*>c]g%",QqsuTSt*Zl:??J jGExQѯ+rOLf[ԑplP)uu<|0ZG>OtvϧԴPwP?:pѦޣ8ݘXI7B4A.~{ݣn]?&tnYXŞ+LRVi50CGE6 &>v\P|2Zw9ܻ-L&w0`D֠wCPbLTM}PAX \7 >) 3PlmNl}h`1 5%aFi0xz[2(%E2 EEKy3@ $h5az./mbo$w$]I+TbD8JnOu$cwJ"ڹLX*QY,p[/ ͙JRd0u Q="`&Qea*0pRx5Qn/Zb٦By^i$w&]YJh5`HLMqsr`!go3p#Eq"O(12,Xh4l:4ESsĽ'ShƏ00UEBfѧSh+9pPs>`|=-0Xհݹ p>q|>I8%?jVzq}nMAV? Ty
v|9p9E#rUϚX 5<.&B#57cښLr畔uIY(hJS5
LyG).EwJl㜜;F]s;tOִ/OZbxh6(U7mH_ƠT:ޯR[k
M
2W}aԵ DA
n:\X3,#
l,.h?4W0%Ϳl \1ȢmD
jrA5 Ȕmyt~4EiZ\-}sf8, J;
HoIJ*6*SXSĝyд\"қy}@n&zg@>9`3 ǟGRlC2DhQ+}neDIUU[33R%fx#e\46L XbOF3FK^Lg,/,+i{uMٕ.R\|znN BrShfh:lD>tZB_`֚?ΆRP$P/#[յ/Q+wڶ{Mt]QGq,bj\X< |