|
|
|

10 Ways Windows 7 Will Be More Secure than Vista
Share
By: Don Reisinger
2009-10-21
Article Rating:    / 6
There are 6 user comments on this Network Security & Hardware story.
10 Ways Windows 7 Will Be More Secure than Vista (
Page 1 of 2 ) News Analysis: With Windows 7's Oct. 22 release just one day away, the focus in the debate over whether the new OS is better than its predecessor is turning to security. Will it be more secure than Windows Vista? If the sheer number of security features is any indication, you bet.Windows 7's Oct. 22 launch is just a day away. But whether or not it will be
more
secure than Windows Vista is still up for debate. Will it be as secure as Vista?
Will it be more secure? At this point, the opinions are flying.
I believe that Windows
7 will be more secure than its predecessor. In some cases, Microsoft simply
updated previous security features. In other cases, it added new features. But
either way, Windows 7 stands to set a new benchmark for Windows security.
Here's why:
1. User Account Control
When Vista launched, User Account Control was annoying and, based on most
estimates, not all that helpful. It certainly helped limit spyware applications
from launching, but "click fatigue"users clicking on warnings without
reading them because they popped up so oftencaused more security problems than
Microsoft bargained for. In Windows 7, User Account Control isn't so annoying.
It's also more intelligent. That can only mean one thing: better security.
2. Backup focus
In previous versions of Windows, Microsoft didn't spend nearly enough time
reminding users to back up data. It also failed to point out how important
backing up data is when security issues do arise. In Windows 7, a backup tool
is placed prominently in the Action Center,
making it a nice reminder to folks that backing up a computer really is part of
keeping data secure.
3. BitLocker
Although it's only available in high-end versions of the software, Windows
7 now features a significantly improved drive-encryption tool called BitLocker.
The feature encrypts the user's hard drive, making it inaccessible without
proper credentials. It's a feature that's available from free, third-party
tools, but having it running natively in Windows is an added bonus.
4. Let's see your fingerprint
Although some computers running Vista featured
biometric technology, all of the drivers and support applications were
delivered by the third-party developer. In Windows 7, Microsoft has added biometric
support, allowing computers with biometric support to work without the need for
third-party software. It's a major security advancement. A Windows PC is
typically more secure with biometrics. At the same time, Windows 7's biometrics
feature means there will be fewer third-party applications running in the
environment. The fewer the third-party apps, the greater
the chance of improving security. Security is still very much a numbers
game.
| | Reader Comments: 10 Ways Windows 7 Will Be More Secure than Vista | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | Features don't mean security"the sheer number of security features" has never been a worthwhile indicator of a product's security.
Sure, Windows 7 has some new features. It... Posted At: 10-22-09 By: Eric Jacksch | | | | | | UAC is like a nicotine patchFrom the horse's mouth as it were:
"UAC is meant to be a transitional system in Vista for applications that were written for Windows XP, Cowan... Posted At: 10-22-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleThe point is that most users, most of the time, should be logging in using standard user accounts. UAC involves logging in with two tokens, admin... Posted At: 10-22-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | UAC is great security practice for admins!Actually, UAC is an excellent security practice for Admins, it is just horrible and a "partial" solution for standard users. I would much rather have... Posted At: 10-22-09 By: Microsoft MVP | | | | | | Not a correct articleSorry, but UAC is NOT more secure in 7! BitLocker, FIrewall, and some other of these listed are in Vista. Yes, AppLocker and BitLocker To Go are... Posted At: 10-22-09 By: Microsoft MVP | | | | | | A user comment on this articleIf you really wanted to be secure, you'd run with a standard user account. Logging on as admin with UAC isn't good security practice; it's just... Posted At: 10-21-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |
|
|
x}ks㶲qUS|ik)ٖgtb[>f-ERc!)ۚrkd{㩱IhݍFh!{A \:2H~<4<ޛ7ouL9Y#C
rD3,wU
Eﮪjc;0\ 6 \YOy+wx;`KQ{QMe0Ǔ4ߚ1=ͩ:6|fx97)\
3Ңmeb
پЉ_u29JDrv!pc$IDqX^'a~GaΔش1)IBd+B(?F#"
a}?C߭w{/!XaM~jMߵ1Zv4b#0+eO3
aŰA#9p<^ޝ@/!X)sDƖ4IAd!LJc:t,=<C^C]ͱ:R,REՌԩiAsTTC⫶9\I?B1 |