CISPA Proposal Is Not Son of SOPA, Despite Internet Hype

 
 
By Wayne Rash  |  Posted 2012-04-14 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

NEWS ANALYSIS: The Cyber Intelligence Sharing bill working its way through the House gives business and the intelligence community critically important tools to fight hackers. It doesn’t threaten citizens’ First Amendment rights in the way that the proposed "Stop Online Piracy Act" does.

In case you hadn€™t noticed, there€™s a huge outcry going on around the Internet right now regarding CISPA. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011, which has yet to be debated before the full House, is being called everything from the €œSon of SOPA€ to a dangerous invasion of First Amendment rights. In fact, it is neither.

SOPA, the €œStop Online Piracy Act,€ caused furious protests by Internet companies, Web users at large and First Amendment advocates claiming that the proposed legislation would stifle free speech and give law enforcement excessive powers to shut down Websites without judicial review. Public opposition has effectively stalled SOPA in Congress.

Unfortunately it does not appear that the people currently ranting on Reddit and elsewhere have actually read the proposed CISPA legislation. Had they done so, they€™d have found that CISPA is in fact focused on national security and the theft of classified and R&D information. Note that the copy of the bill in the link is the marked-up version including amendments under consideration. Changes in markup are in green, and amendments are in yellow.

The current text of CISPA is also online, as are an amendment that would prevent any quid-pro-quo forcing of information sharing and one that adds a reporting requirement. Note that the amendments are written by the sponsors of the bill, so their incorporation into the final draft is certain.

Once you€™ve read through the bill, it€™s clear that this law is intended to allow the intelligence community to share information with private companies that have been attacked or are at risk of being attacked. What this means is that those who should be most worried are the teams of Chinese hackers and other state-sponsored attackers who are waging a constant war against U.S. interests and intellectual property by breaking into computer systems to steal secrets.

These attacks have been happening for some time, and while a few companies have managed to thwart them, as when Lockheed Martin beat off a Chinese attack, the fact is that such attacks persist, and they€™re not aimed at just the giants of the defense industry, but also at companies such as Google. And the attacks have been successful.

Aircraft maker Boeing was reportedly attacked, and the information gathered was used by the Chinese government in the development of its own passenger aircraft. Such attacks are relentless and unlike in the U.S. and Western Europe, they€™re not just for military advantage. These attacks, while carried out by the military in their respective countries are really as much commercial attacks as they are for military intelligence.




 
 
 
 
Wayne Rash Wayne Rash is a Senior Analyst for eWEEK Labs and runs the magazine's Washington Bureau. Prior to joining eWEEK as a Senior Writer on wireless technology, he was a Senior Contributing Editor and previously a Senior Analyst in the InfoWorld Test Center. He was also a reviewer for Federal Computer Week and Information Security Magazine. Previously, he ran the reviews and events departments at CMP's InternetWeek.

He is a retired naval officer, a former principal at American Management Systems and a long-time columnist for Byte Magazine. He is a regular contributor to Plane & Pilot Magazine and The Washington Post.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel